Rosenfeld v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 76

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 75 Stipulation of Dismissal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 MELINDA HAAG 2 United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CA Bar No. 152348) 3 Chief, Civil Division ILA C. DEISS (NY Bar No. 3052909) 4 Assistant United States Attorneys 5 6 7 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-7124 Fax: (415) 436-7169 Ila.deiss@usdoj.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 SETH ROSENFELD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 17 AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 18 Defendants. 19 Case No.: C 11-2131 MEJ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 21 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), Plaintiff hereby stipulates to the dismissal of this 22 action with prejudice pursuant to the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement effective March 23 10, 2015 (“Settlement Agreement”). Plaintiff's pending Freedom of Information and Privacy Act 24 requests with the Federal Bureau of Investigation are deemed withdrawn as specified in the Settlement 25 26 Agreement. 27 28 // Stipulation to Dismiss Case No.: C 11-2131 MEJ 1 1 Dated: March 10, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 2 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 3 /s/ ________________ ILA C. DEISS Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants 4 5 6 7 Dated: March 10, 2015 8 _________/s/__________________ BENJAMIN WOLF STEIN Attorney for Plaintiff 9 10 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: April 23, 2015 16 ___________________________________ HONONABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Dismiss Case No.: C 11-2131 MEJ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?