ADC Technology Inc. v. Palm Inc.
Filing
73
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Palm Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2012. Initial Case Management Conference reset from 5/18/12 to 9/28/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/10/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Mark D. Flanagan (SBN 130303)
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128)
nathan.walker @wilmerhale.com
Christine Duh (SBN 228544)
christine.duh@wilmerhale.com
Anna T. Lee (SBN 244961)
anna.lee @wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6101
Attorneys for Defendants
PALM, INC. and
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
ADC TECHNOLOGY, INC.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
PALM, INC., and
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
CONTINUANCE OF CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
ORDER
Civil L.R. 7-12
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
1
The parties to this action—plaintiff ADC Technology, Inc. (“ADC”) and defendants Palm,
2
Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. (collectively, “Palm”)—respectfully submit this stipulation, requesting
3
that the Court continue the Case Management Conference previously scheduled in this action for
4
May 18, 2012 to a date in September 2012, or an alternative future date that is convenient to the
5
Court. Good cause exists for this continuance, as set forth below:
6
This is a patent case in which the plaintiff, ADC, asserts three patents—namely, U.S.
7
Patent Nos. 6,985,136 (the “’136 patent”), 7,057,605 (the “’605 patent”) and 7,567,361
8
(the “’361 patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).
9
Office (“PTO”) ordered reexamination of each of the three patents-in-suit.
10
11
In mid-2011, pursuant to a third-party request, the United States Patent and Trademark
In July 2011, defendant Palm filed a stipulated motion to stay this case pending final
12
determination of the reexamination of the patents-in-suit by the PTO. (See Docket
13
No. 68.) Plaintiff ADC stipulated to this stay motion. (Id.)
14
On July 25, 2011, the Court granted the stipulated stay motion and ordered that “[t]his
15
action is stayed pending final determination of the reexamination of the patents-in-suit”
16
by the PTO. (See Docket No. 70.) In its order, the Court instructed the parties to advise
17
the Court when the PTO has issued a final determination on reexamination. (Id.) In
18
addition, the Court set a case management conference for May 11, 2012, which was
19
subsequently re-set for May 18, 2012. (Id.)
20
There has not yet been a final determination of the reexamination of all of the patents-in-
21
suit. Although the PTO has issued a reexamination certificate for one of the patents in
22
suit (the ’136 patent), the reexamination on the other two patents-in-suit (the ’605 and
23
’361 patents) remains ongoing.
24
25
The parties presently agree that this action should remain stayed pending a final
determination of the reexamination of at least the ’361 patent.
26
27
28
-2Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
1
In view of the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the Case Management
2
Conference previously set for May 18 be continued to a date in September 2012, or an alternative
3
future date that is convenient to the Court.
4
Dated: May 8, 2012
5
/s/ Nathan L. Walker_______
Mark D. Flanagan (SBN 130303)
mark.flanagan@wilmerhale.com
Nathan L. Walker (SBN 206128)
nathan.walker @wilmerhale.com
Christine Duh (SBN 228544)
christine.duh@wilmerhale.com
Anna T. Lee (SBN 244961)
anna.lee @wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6101
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants
PALM, INC. and
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 8, 2012
/s/ Richard B. Megley, Jr.____
Raymond P. Niro (pro hac vice)
Dean D. Niro (pro hac vice)
Patrick F. Solon (pro hac vice)
Richard B. Megley, Jr. (pro hac vice)
Joseph A. Culig (pro hac vice)
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
181 West Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: (312) 236-0733
Facsimile: (312) 236-3137
Martin L. Fineman, (SBN 104413)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery St., Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111-6533
Telephone: (415) 276-6500
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
ATTORNEYS for Plaintiff
ADC TECHNOLOGY, INC.
-3Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Case Management Conference previously set for May 18, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. is hereby
3
28
continued to September ___, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate
4
Avenue, San Francisco, California. A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by September 21, 2012.
12
en
LI
ER
FO
d M. Ch
dwar
Judge E
R NIA
D
AS MO
H
11
RT
10
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
DERED
SO OR ED
S States District Judge
United
IT I
IFI
NO
9
_________________________________
A
8
UNIT
ED
7
10
Dated: May ___, 2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
6
S
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
1
2
I, Anna Lee, hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the
3
electronic filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. I declare under
4
penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct.
5
Executed on May 8, 2012, in Palo Alto, California.
6
By: _ /s/ Anna Lee
Anna Lee
7
___________________
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5Joint Stipulation Requesting Continuance of Case Management Conference
ACTIVEUS 95889991v3
Case No. 3:11-cv-02136-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?