Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 36

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

1
2
3
4

Stuart H. Singer
BOIES, SCHILLER, & FLEXNER LLP
401 East Law Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7

Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

9
10

OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,

CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI
INDIVIDUAL ACTION NO. 11-cv-02225

11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

15

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO
MOTIONS TO
DISMISS OR FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

18

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
Date: November 11, 2011
Time: 9:00 am
Courtroom: 10

19

The Honorable Susan J. Illston

16
17

20
21
-captioned case against AU Optronics Corporation, AU

22
23

Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics

24

USA, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Epson Electronics

25

America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.,

26

Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Mitsui &

27

Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Electronics America,

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-1-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

1

Inc., NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics

2

Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., SANYO Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp

3

Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba

4

America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba

5

Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display

6
7
8
9

WHEREAS
Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket Entry 25) on August 22, 2011;
WHEREAS Defendants, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,

10

Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., AU

11

Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a

12

Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,

13

Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi

14

Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.,

15

Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Co. of America, Inc., Chunghwa

16

Picture Tubes, Ltd., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.,

17

Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., HannStar

18

Display Corporation, and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., filed a Joint Notice of Motion and Motion
;

19
20

WHEREAS Defendant, SANYO Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., filed a Joinder to

21
, (Docket Entry 29) on August 22, 2011;

22
23
24

WHEREAS Defendants, NEC Corporation, NEC Electronics America, Inc., and NEC
LCD Technologies, Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative,

25
26
27
28

Complaint (Docket Entry 31) on August 22, 2011;
WHEREAS Office Depot

to the aforementioned motions would be due on

September 6, 2011;
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-2-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

1

NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree as follows:

2

The time for Office Depot to respond to the aforementioned motions to dismiss or to file

3
4

an amended complaint is postponed until September 19, 2011.
If Office Depot files oppositions to the aforementioned motions to dismiss, the time for

5

all Defendants to file their replies is postponed until October 3, 2011. The hearing on the

6

aforementioned motions to dismiss is noticed for and will be held on November 11, 2011, or at

7

such other time as is convenient for the Court.

8
9

If Office Depot files an amended complaint, then all Defendants will have 30 days to
respond to the amended complaint.

10
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12

By: /s/ Robert D. Wick________________________
Robert D. Wick (Pro hac vice)
Derek Ludwin (Pro hac vice)
Neil K. Roman (Pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Counsel for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung
Electronics America, Inc.

20
21
22

By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz_________________
Michael R. Lazerwitz (Pro hac vice)
Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)
Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-3-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

1

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.

2
3

By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau__________________
Christopher A. Nedeau (State Bar No. 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (State Bar No. 124158)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4799
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation
and AU Optronics Corporation America

10
11
12

By: /s/ Christopher B. Hockett___________________
Christopher B. Hockett (Bar No. 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (Bar No. 254862)
Sandra West (Bar No. 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (Bar No. 254427)
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

13
14
15
16
17
18

Counsel for Defendants Chimei Innolux Corporation
(f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei
Optoelectronics USA, Inc. CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

19
20
21

By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero_____________________
Stephen P. Freccero (State Bar No. 131093)
Melvin R. Goldman (State Bar No. 34097)
Derek F. Foran (State Bar No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-4-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

Counsel for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices
Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

1
2

By: /s/ Kent M. Roger__________________________
Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987)
Michelle Kim-Szrom (State Bar No. 252901)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA),
Inc.

10
11
12

By: /s/ Allison A. Davis________________________
Allison A. Davis
Sam N. Dawood
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Nick S. Verwolf
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
777 108th Avenue NE, Suite 2300
Bellevue, WA 98004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Defendant SANYO Consumer Electronics
Co., Ltd.

24
25

By: /s/ John M. Grenfell______________________
John M. Grenfell (State Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (State Bar No. 290134)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-5-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

1
2
3

Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corporation

4
5

By: /s/ Joel S. Sanders_________________________
Joel S. Sanders (State Bar No. 107234)
Rachel S. Brass (State Bar No. 219301)
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Counsel for Defendants Tatung Co. of America, Inc.
and Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.

13
14

By:/s/ John H. Chung__________________________
John H. Chung (Pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19

Christopher M. Curran (Pro hac vice)
Kristen J. McAhern (Pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
701 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington DC
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24
25

Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile
Display Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-6-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

By: /s/ George D. Niespolo_____________________
George D. Niespolo (SBN) 72107)
Stephen H. Sutro (SBN 172168)
Jennifer Briggs Fisher (SBN 241321)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1104
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendants NEC Corporation, NEC LCD
Technologies, Ltd., and NEC Electronics America, Inc.

9
10

By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford____________________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Counsel for Defendants Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.
and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.

19
20
21

By: /s/ Hugh F. Bangasser_______________________
Hugh F. Bangasser (Pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (Pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98004-1158
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27

Jeffrey L. Bornstein (State Bar No. 99358)
K&L GATES LLP

28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-7-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

3

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 9411-5994
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

4

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation

1
2

5
6

By: /s/ Stuart H. Singer________________________
Stuart H. Singer
BOIES, SCHILLER, & FLEXNER LLP
401 East Law Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10
11

William A. Isaacson (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
Melissa Willett (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16
17

Philip J. Iovieno (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21

Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.

22
23

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other
signatories thereto has been obtained.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-8-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED
By:
_______________________________________
Honorable Susan J. Illston
United States District Judge

2
3
4

Dated:___________________________________
9/7/11

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-9-

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)