Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER (11-2225) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
Telephone:
216.621.0200
Facsimile:
216.696.0740
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

Tracy Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11
Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan),
Ltd.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

19
20

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI

MDL No. 1827

21
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,
22
Plaintiff,
23
v.
24

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANT MITSUI & CO.
(TAIWAN), LTD. TO RESPOND TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
25
Defendants.

Clerk’s Action Required

26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiff Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) filed a First Amended

2

Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. (“Mitsui

3

Taiwan”), among other defendants, on September 19, 2011.

4

Whereas, Office Depot and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into a stipulation giving

5

Mitsui Taiwan until October 19, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the

6

First Amended Complaint. (See Dkt. #35; MDL Dkt. #3455.)

1, 2011 in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

10

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

11

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Office Depot, on the one hand, and

12
CLEV ELA ND

Civil Rule L.R. 6-1(a), pursuant to which Mitsui Taiwan shall have an extension until December

9

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

WHEREAS, Office Depot and Mitsui Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to

8

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

7

Mitsui Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan’s deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or

13

otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will be December 1, 2011.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Dated: October 4, 2011
By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno_________________
Philip J. Iovieno
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.

7
8
9

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories
thereto has been obtained.

10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4th
October, 2011
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.

13
14

By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON

15
16
17
18
19

503774832

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI