Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting extension of time to respond to amended complaint re #64 . (#4205) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011) Modified on 12/2/2011 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
Telephone:
216.621.0200
Facsimile:
216.696.0740
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan),
Ltd.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

20
21

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI

MDL No. 1827

22
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,
23
Plaintiff,
24
v.
25

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANT MITSUI & CO.
(TAIWAN), LTD. TO RESPOND TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
26
Defendants.

Clerk’s Action Required

27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiff Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) filed a First Amended

2

Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. (“Mitsui

3

Taiwan”), among other defendants, on September 19, 2011.

4

WHEREAS, Office Depot and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into two stipulations, the

5

first giving Mitsui Taiwan, among other defendants, thirty (30) days after the filing of a First

6

Amended Complaint to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended

7

Complaint, (See Dkt. #35; MDL Dkt. #3455), and the second giving Mitsui Taiwan until

8

December 1, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended

9

Complaint. (See Dkt. #44; MDL Dkt. #3810.)

amended complaint in the related case of Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Epson Imaging

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2011, Mitsui Taiwan intends to move to dismiss the

11
B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

10

Devices Corp., et al., Individual Docket No. 3:10-cv-00117-SI (N.D. Cal.), Master Docket No.

13

3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.) on the grounds that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over

14

Mitsui Taiwan.

15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, Mitsui Taiwan also intends to raise lack of personal jurisdiction as a defense
in the instant case.
WHEREAS, the Court’s ruling on Mitsui Taiwan’s motion to dismiss in Electrograph
may be relevant to the issue of personal jurisdiction in the instant case.

19

WHEREAS, in the interests of efficiency and judicial economy, Office Depot and Mitsui

20

Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil Rule L.R. 6-1(a), that Mitsui Taiwan shall

21

have an additional extension of time until twenty-one (21) days after the Court rules on Mitsui

22

Taiwan’s motion to dismiss in Electrograph, in which to move against, answer, or otherwise

23

respond to Office Depot’s First Amended Complaint.

24

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

25

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Office Depot, on the one hand, and

26

Mitsui Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan’s deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or

27

otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will be twenty-one (21) days after the Court

28

issues its order on Mitsui Taiwan’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint in Electrograph.
1
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

Dated: November 29, 2011

2

By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

13
14
15

Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

16
17
18
19
20
21

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno_________________
Philip J. Iovieno
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Office Depot, Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories
thereto has been obtained.

3
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
30th
Nov
2011
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.

8
By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON

9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-02225-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI