Blount et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al

Filing 53

ORDER re 46 Brief filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Perez, 49 Proposed Order filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Perez, 47 Declaration in Support, filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Per ez, 48 Declaration in Support filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Perez, 45 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Perez, Motions terminated: 45 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses filed by Steve Parker, Jesse Blount, III, Tiffany Perez.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/10/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
JESSE BLOUNT III,

12
13

No. C-11-02227 CRB (DMR)

Plaintiff(s),

NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER
RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

v.

14

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC,

15

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

18

The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu for resolution of

19

Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel, as well as all further discovery. The court DENIES the Motion to

20

Compel without prejudice.

21

Parties shall comply with the procedures in this order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

22

and the Northern District of California’s Local Rules, General Orders, and Standing Orders. Local

23

rules, general orders, standing orders, and instructions for using the Court's Electronic Case Filing

24

system are available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. Failure to comply with any of the rules or

25

orders may be a ground for sanctions.

26
27
28

RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES
In order to respond to discovery disputes in a flexible, cost-effective and efficient manner,
the court uses the following procedure. The parties shall not file formal discovery motions. Instead,

disagreements. The meet and confer session must be in person or by telephone, and may not be

3

conducted by letter, e-mail, or fax. If disagreements remain, the parties shall file a joint letter no

4

later than five business days after the meet and confer session, unless otherwise directed by the

5

court. Lead trial counsel for both parties must sign the letter, which shall include an attestation

6

that the parties met and conferred in person or by telephone regarding all issues prior to filing the

7

letter. Going issue-by-issue, the joint letter shall describe each unresolved issue, summarize each

8

party’s position with appropriate legal authority; and provide each party’s final proposed

9

compromise before moving to the next issue. The joint letter shall not exceed ten pages without

10

leave of court. Parties are expected to plan for and cooperate in preparing the joint letter so

11
For the Northern District of California

as required by the federal and local rules, the parties shall first meet and confer to try to resolve their

2

United States District Court

1

that each side has adequate time to address the arguments. In the rare instance that a joint letter

12

is not possible, each side may submit a letter not to exceed four pages, which shall include an

13

explanation of why a joint letter was not possible. The parties shall submit one exhibit to the letter

14

that only sets forth each disputed discovery request in full, followed immediately by the objections

15

and/or responses thereto. No other information shall be included in any such exhibit. No other

16

exhibits shall be submitted without prior approval by the court. The court will review the

17

submission(s) and determine whether formal briefing or proceedings are necessary. Discovery

18

letter briefs must be e-filed under the Civil Events category of Motions and Related Filings >

19

Motions - General > "Discovery Letter Brief".

20

In the event that a discovery hearing is ordered, the court has found that it is often efficient

21

and beneficial for counsel to appear in person. This provides the opportunity, where appropriate, to

22

engage counsel in resolving aspects of the discovery dispute while remaining available to rule on

23

any disputes that counsel are not able to resolve. For this reason, the court expects counsel to appear

24

in person. Permission for a party to attend by telephone may be granted, in the court's discretion,

25

upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the court determines that

26

good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order

27

to have an effective discovery hearing. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the

28

request.

2

1

In emergencies during discovery events (such as depositions), any party may, after

2

exhausting good faith attempts to resolve disputed issues, seek judicial intervention pursuant to Civil

3

L.R. 37-1(b) by contacting the court through the courtroom deputy. If the court is unavailable, the

4

discovery event shall proceed with objections noted for the record.

5

CHAMBERS COPIES AND PROPOSED ORDERS

6

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7) and 5-2(b), parties must lodge an extra paper copy of certain

7

filings and mark it as a copy for “Chambers.” Please three-hole punch the chambers copy and

8

submit it to the Oakland Clerk’s Office.

9

Any stipulation or proposed order submitted by an e-filing party shall be submitted by email
to [e-mail] as a word processing attachment on the same day the document is e-

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

filed. This address should only be used for this stated purpose unless otherwise directed by the

12

court.

13

PRIVILEGE LOGS

14

If a party withholds information that is responsive to a discovery request by claiming that it

15

is privileged or otherwise protected from discovery, that party shall promptly prepare and provide a

16

privilege log that is sufficiently detailed and informative for the opposing party to assess whether a

17

document’s designation as privileged is justified. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). The privilege log shall

18

set forth the privilege relied upon and specify separately for each document or for each category of

19

similarly situated documents:

20

(a) the title and description of the document, including number of pages or

21

Bates-number range;

22

(b) the subject matter addressed in the document;

23

(c) the identity and position of its author(s);

24

(d) the identity and position of all addressees and recipients;

25

(e) the date the document was prepared and, if different, the date(s) on which it was

26

sent to or shared with persons other than its author(s); and

27

(f) the specific basis for the claim that the document is privileged or protected.

28

3

1

Communications involving trial counsel that post-date the filing of the complaint need not be

2

placed on a privilege log. Failure to furnish this information promptly may be deemed a waiver of

3

the privilege or protection.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: September 10, 2012

8
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4