Kashannejad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al

Filing 107

ORDER re Plaintiff's Filing of June 24, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/25/2012. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMSHID S. KASHANNEJAD,

9

Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

No. C-11-2228 EMC

v.
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF
JUNE 24, 2012
(Docket No. 106)

12
13

Defendants.
___________________________________/

14
15

Per the Court’s order of June 22, 2012, Plaintiff has opted to have the new transportation

16

letter (to be addressed to the CBP) to be mailed to him. To the extent Plaintiff has asked for relief in

17

his filing of June 24, 2012, the request is denied. In this current request for relief, Plaintiff simply

18

asks for the same relief as previously requested, essentially ignoring the prior rulings of the Court.

19

C

The Court has already held that it is immaterial whether Plaintiff could use the courtesy copy

20

of the transportation letter to purchase a ticket from the carrier. That is because the sole

21

purpose of the courtesy copy is to give Plaintiff notice of the contents of the letter. See

22

Docket Nos. 88, 102 (orders). Plaintiff is to give the sealed transportation letter to the

23

carrier (not a travel agency) to purchase the ticket.

24

C

The Court has already approved the contents of the transportation letter. Plaintiff has no

25

evidence that the transportation letter actually issued by Defendants does not have the same

26

content. Indeed, the courtesy copy has the same content.

27

The Court’s prior order of June 22 remains in effect. Now that Plaintiff has elected to have

28

the new transportation letter (to CBP) mailed to him, he must provide a photograph by July 6, 2012.

1

Defendants then have one week from the date that they receive the photograph to mail the new

2

transportation letter (using a delivery tracking method).

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: June 25, 2012

7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2