Kashannejad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al

Filing 154

ORDER Re 152 153 Plaintiff's Filings of October 2 and 4, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/4/2012. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMSHID S. KASHANNEJAD,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C-11-2228 EMC

Plaintiff,
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILINGS OF
OCTOBER 2 AND 4, 2012

v.
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.,

(Docket Nos. 152-53)

12
13

Defendants.
___________________________________/

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Plaintiff has filed two additional unsolicited briefs, dated October 2 and 4, 2012. Having
reviewed the briefs and the accompanying submissions, the Court hereby rules as follows.
1.

To the extent Plaintiff claims once again that he cannot afford a ticket, the Court has

already stated that cost is not a matter for the Court. See Docket No. 151 (Order at 1).
2.

To the extent Plaintiff claims once again that he may not be able to travel to Turkey

21

(to pick up the transportation letter(s)) because of conditions either there or in Iran itself, he has not

22

provided sufficient evidence that such travel is not possible.

23

3.

To the extent Plaintiff asks the Court to order Defendants to express an opinion on

24

the applicability of 8 U.S.C. § 1182 to Plaintiff’s situation, the request is DENIED. This is

25

essentially a rehash of Plaintiff’s contention that 8 C.F.R. § 245a.7(u)(2)(ii) is inapplicable to him.

26

The Court has already declined to rule on this issue on multiple occasions. See, e.g., Docket Nos.

27

50, 53, 63, 84, 88, 114.

28

1

4.

To the extent Plaintiff suggests that Defendants have not adequately complied with

2

the Court’s order to meet and confer, Plaintiff’s request for relief is premature. Plaintiff admits that

3

Defendants have contacted him to meet and confer. That Plaintiff has not been placed in touch with

4

the appropriate airline representatives already is not surprising given that the Court’s order to meet

5

and confer was just issued on October 2, 2012.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: October 4, 2012
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2