Kashannejad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al

Filing 187

ORDER re 184 , 185 , 186 Status Reports. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/26/2013. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAMSHID S. KASHANNEJAD, 9 No. C-11-2228 EMC Plaintiff, ORDER RE STATUS REPORTS v. (Docket Nos. 184-86) 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., 12 13 Defendants. ___________________________________/ 14 15 On February 7, 2013, Plaintiff filed a status report. See Docket No. 184. On February 25, 16 2013, Defendants filed a status report in response. See Docket No. 185. Plaintiff thereafter filed a 17 response on February 26, 2013. See Docket No. 186. In his papers, Plaintiff basically claims that, 18 in spite of his best efforts, Emirates Airlines has refused to sell him a ticket. Plaintiff asks, in 19 essence, that the process be started again (with certain changes) with a new carrier, KLM. 20 Defendants propose a method of proceeding with Emirates. Having reviewed the parties’ 21 submissions, the Court hereby rules as follows. 22 1. Defendants have made a sufficient offer of proof that -- contrary to what Plaintiff 23 represents -- Emirates was willing to assist him. The Court also notes that Plaintiff appears to have 24 given incorrect information to Emirates. See Docket No. 185, Ex. A (e-mail from Ms. Hafezalsehe 25 to Mr. Tuite, dated February 18, 2013) (stating that Plaintiff “said that he had valid travel document 26 inside sealed envelope which he was agreed too that this envelope could not be opened till he 27 reaches to destination”) (emphasis added). 28 1 2. Defendants have made a sufficient offer of proof that Emirates is currently willing to 2 sell Plaintiff a ticket (if the purchase is made within the next week, even though the transportation 3 letter expired on February 18, 2013). 4 3. Although the Court has ordered Defendants to facilitate Plaintiff’s return to the 5 United States, there are limits to what Defendants are able to do, as well as the Court. The Court is 6 satisfied that Defendants have been making their best efforts and further has concerns that Plaintiff’s 7 actions have actually hampered his ability to return (e.g., giving Emirates incorrect information, not 8 notifying the Court about the purported problem with Emirates until approximately 10 days before 9 the transportation letter was due to expire). The Court shall make one final attempt to assist Plaintiff. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 4. Although the transportation letter has technically expired, Defendants have made 12 arrangements with Emirates that will allow Plaintiff to submit the expired letter and still purchase a 13 ticket, so long as certain conditions are met. The Court has reviewed those conditions and finds 14 them, for the most part, reasonable. To the extent Plaintiff claims that he could suffer severe 15 consequences if he tried to travel with an expired transportation letter, see Docket No. 186 (Pl.’s 16 Status Report at 4), he has not made an adequate offer of proof. Moreover, Defendants cannot be 17 blamed for Plaintiff having signed a document admitting to guilt of leaving the country illegally. 18 a. Accordingly, if Plaintiff wishes to return to the United States, then he must 19 return to the Emirates office in Tehran within one week of the date of this order and specifically 20 ask to speak with Ms. Hafezalsehe. Plaintiff shall bring with him the transportation letters; a copy of 21 the November 9, 2011, decision from USCIS in which the agency restored his status to that of a 22 lawful temporary resident, see Docket No. 185 (Exhibit C); and a copy of this order. Plaintiff 23 should purchase a ticket for a flight from Tehran to Dubai to Los Angeles. If Plaintiff has any 24 trouble, he should immediately contact a representative of Defendants by telephone. Defendants are 25 ordered to provide a name and telephone number for a representative within one day of the date of 26 this order (via ECF). Defendants’ representative should be prepared to address any concerns raised 27 by Ms. Hafezalsehe concerning the ticketing. The telephone number for the representative should 28 be one at which the representative is available on, in essence, a 24-hour basis. Defense counsel, 2 1 Victor M. Lawrence, should also make himself available to assist the representative (assuming that 2 he is not designated the representative). 3 b. As soon as Plaintiff purchases the ticket (seven days in advance of travel), he 4 shall within 24 hours make a filing (via ECF) notifying the Court and Defendants of the purchase of 5 the ticket. At that point, Defendants shall work with their contacts at Emirates to ensure that 6 Plaintiff is able to board the flight with the travel documents in his possession. To the extent 7 Plaintiff has any difficulty boarding the flight, he should immediate call Defendants’ representative 8 and advise of the problem. In addition, Defendants shall work with CBP at LAX to ensure that 9 Plaintiff experiences no difficulty upon his arrival in Los Angeles with the travel documents in his possession. To the extent he has any problem, he should immediately contact Defendants’ 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 representative. 12 c. Within two weeks of the date of this order, Defendants shall submit a 13 declaration, testifying as to whether they have complied with this Court’s order. Defendants should 14 also provide any details regarding their assistance in Plaintiff’s return to the United States. Upon 15 review, should the Court find that Defendants satisfied their obligations set forth herein, then it shall 16 (1) discharge Defendants from any additional obligation to facilitate Plaintiff’s return to the 17 United States, (2) enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff but make clear that no relief is 18 otherwise available to Plaintiff, and (3) close the file in this case. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: February 26, 2013 23 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?