Holguin v. HDR Architecture Incorporated

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 18 Stipulation filed by Jesus A. Holguin. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/9/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)

1
2
3
4

EUGENE T. FRANKLIN (SBN: 124881)
FRANKLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP
Attorneys at Law
22762 Main Street
Hayward, California 94541
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
JESUS A. HOLGUIN
JAMERSON C. ALLEN
(SBN: 132866)
CORTNEY L. MCDEVITT (SBN: 241879)
JACKSON LEWIS LLP
199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
HDR ARCHITECTURE, INC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

Jesus A. Holguin,

17
18

Plaintiff,
v.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

HDR Architecture, Incorporated, a
Nebraska Corporation and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: C 11-02244 EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND
ORDER THEREON

Complaint Filed: March 28, 2011
Trial Date:
September 24, 2012

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and General Releases between Defendant HDR
ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED and Plaintiff JESUS A. HOLGUIN, the parties
hereby stipulate and request that all parties and claims be dismissed with prejudice in

27
28

-1-

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: C 11-02244 EMC)

1

the above-entitled action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (requiring stipulation for

2

voluntary dismissals after responsive pleadings have been filed).

3

Dated:

November 8, 2011

FRANKLIN EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP
/s/

4

By: _____________________________
EUGENE T. FRANKLIN

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
JESUS A. HOLGUIN

7
8

Dated: November 8, 2011

JACKSON LEWIS LLP
/s/

9

By:______________________________
JAMERSON C. ALLEN
CORTNEY L. MCDEVITT

10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
HDR ARCHITECTURE, INC.

12
13
14

ORDER
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint and any and all claims for relief in
16
the above-referenced matter, U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. Case No. C 11-02244 EMC, are
17
hereby dismissed with prejudice.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

9
Dated: November ___, 2011

21

ORD
T IS SO

ERED

22
23

RT

24

FO

NO

R NIA

I
____________________________
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Courtn
Judge
. Che
ward M
d
Judge E

25
26

A

H

ER

LI

20

RT
U
O

S

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

27
28

-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON (CASE NO.: C 11-02244 EMC)