Aspen Shackleton, III, LLC v. Saelee
Filing
4
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/12/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2011)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
Northern District of California
5
6
ASPEN SHACKETON, III, LLC
Plaintiff(s),
7
v.
8
No. C 11-02272 MEJ
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION
FORM
SAN HIN SAELEE
9
10
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Pending before the Court is Defendant San Hin Saelee's in forma pauperis application. Upon
13
review of the record in this action, the Court notes that Defendant has not filed a written consent to
14
Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge
15
James for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges
16
of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial
17
and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by
18
Magistrate Judge James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
19
Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
20
You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and
21
disposition. Accordingly, Defendant shall inform the Court, by way of the enclosed form, whether
22
Defendant consents to Magistrate Judge James’ jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United
23
States District Judge for trial. The consent/declination form shall be filed by June 2, 2011.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 12, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
Plaintiff(s),
5
6
7
8
No. C 11-02272 MEJ
ASPEN SHACKETON, III, LLC
vs.
SAN HIN SAELEE
Defendant(s).
/
9
10
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party hereby
12
consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in this
13
case, including trial, and order the entry of final judgment, and voluntarily waives the right to
14
proceed before a United States District Judge.
15
16
Dated:_________________________
Signed by:____________________________
17
Counsel for:__________________________
18
19
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United
21
States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition, and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to
22
a United States District Judge.
23
24
Dated:___________________________
Signed by:____________________________
25
Counsel for:__________________________
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
ASPEN SHACKETON, III, LLC
7
8
9
10
Case Number: 11-02272 MEJ
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
SAN HIN SAELEE
Defendant.
/
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on May 12, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
San Hin Saelee
2115 12th Avenue #D
Oakland, CA 94606
18
19
20
Dated: May 12, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?