Lopez v. Knot Inc

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Mediation Completion Date and Post-Mediation Status Conference. Status Report due by 1/13/2012. Status Conference set for 1/20/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD M. BRODY (SBN 84927) hbrodyproskauer.com SUSAN L. GUTIERREZ (SBN 273980) sgutierrez@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 Telephone: 310.557.2900 Facsimile: 310.557.2193 Attorneys for Defendant XO GROUP INC. (f/k/a/ The Knot, Inc.) 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER LOPEZ, Plaintiff, 13 14 Hon. Edward M. Chen Defendants. 11 12 Case No. CV 11-02274 EMC [PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE AND POST-MEDIATION STATUS CONFERENCE vs. THE KNOT, INC., 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE (Case No. CV-11-2274 EMC) 1 ORDER 2 For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that: 3 1. 6 2. The post-mediation status conference set for December 23, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. is continued to January 20, 2012, at 10:30 a.m.; 7 3. The parties’ post-mediation status conference reports shall be due on or by 8 January 13, 2012. S R NIA ER H 14 RT 13 _____________________________________ Judge, United StateshDistrict Court en rd M. C ge Edwa Jud NO 12 FO 11 10/19 Dated: ____________, 2011 UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 5 including January 13, 2012; 15 A 4 The mediation completion date is continued from December 15, 2011, to and N D IS T IC T R OF C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE (Case No. CV-11-2274 EMC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?