Lopez v. Knot Inc
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Mediation Completion Date and Post-Mediation Status Conference. Status Report due by 1/13/2012. Status Conference set for 1/20/2012 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD M. BRODY (SBN 84927)
hbrodyproskauer.com
SUSAN L. GUTIERREZ (SBN 273980)
sgutierrez@proskauer.com
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East, 32nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206
Telephone: 310.557.2900
Facsimile: 310.557.2193
Attorneys for Defendant
XO GROUP INC. (f/k/a/ The Knot, Inc.)
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JENNIFER LOPEZ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
11
12
Case No. CV 11-02274 EMC
[PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE AND
POST-MEDIATION STATUS
CONFERENCE
vs.
THE KNOT, INC.,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE
(Case No. CV-11-2274 EMC)
1
ORDER
2
For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that:
3
1.
6
2.
The post-mediation status conference set for December 23, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. is
continued to January 20, 2012, at 10:30 a.m.;
7
3.
The parties’ post-mediation status conference reports shall be due on or by
8
January 13, 2012.
S
R NIA
ER
H
14
RT
13
_____________________________________
Judge, United StateshDistrict Court
en
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
NO
12
FO
11
10/19
Dated: ____________, 2011
UNIT
ED
10
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
LI
5
including January 13, 2012;
15
A
4
The mediation completion date is continued from December 15, 2011, to and
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED ORDER] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION COMPLETION DATE
(Case No. CV-11-2274 EMC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?