Alemu et al v. Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
50
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 21, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
ANNA M. MARTIN - State Bar No. 154279
JOSEPH F. CHARLES - State Bar No. 228456
1051 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, California 94115
Telephone (415) 561-8440
Facsimile (415) 561-8430
Attorneys for Defendants
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
OF LOS ANGELES (improperly sued as
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
7
8
9
10
11
LAW OFFICE OF JASON WOLFORD
JASON N. WOLFORD, ESQ. - State Bar No. 194177
101 Tunstead Avenue
San Anselmo, CA 94960
Telephone (415) 729-5529
Facsimile (415) 524-4853
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ABAI ALEMU and ZAFU BELETE
12
13
14
15
16
17
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
MICHAEL BOLECHOWSKI, ESQ. - State Bar No. 118725
ERIC S. WONG, ESQ. - State Bar No. 197310
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2725
Telephone (415) 433-0990
Facsimile (415) 434-1370
Attorneys for Defendant
TRUE MANUFACTURING
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
ABAI ALEMU and ZAFU BELETE,
Case No. CV 11-02323 WHA MMC
22
Plaintiff,
23
24
25
vs.
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC.;
COCA-COLA COMPANY; TRUE
MANUFACTURING CO., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER
Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 41(a)
26
Defendants.
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Case No. CV 11-02323
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, by and through their
2
counsel of record herein, that the above-captioned action, which was consolidated with United
3
States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. CV 11-02323 by Court Order
4
dated June 23, 2011, may be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of
5
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
6
The parties shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs of suit.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
RIMAC MARTIN, P.C.
9
10
DATED: August 13, 2012
By:
11
12
/S/ ANNA M. MARTIN
ANNA M. MARTIN
Attorneys for Defendant
BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF
LOS ANGELES (improperly sued herein as THE
COCA-COLA COMPANY)
13
14
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN,
& DICKER
15
16
DATED: August 13, 2012
By:
17
18
/S/ ERIC S. WONG
ERIC S. WONG
Attorneys for Defendant
TRUE MANUFACTURING
19
LAW OFFICE OF JASON WOLFORD LLP
20
21
DATED: August 13, 2012
By:
22
23
/S/ JASON N. WOLFORD
JASON N. WOLFORD
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ABAI ALEMU and ZAFU BELETE
24
25
26
27
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED: August 21
, 2012
By:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
2
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Case No. CV 11-02323
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?