Hard Drive Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-53

Filing 34

ORDER RE SUBPOENA. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 11/15/2011. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

HARD DRIVE PRODUCTIONS,
Plaintiffs,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

No. 3:11-CV-02330 EDL
ORDER

v.
DOES 1-53,
Defendants.

/

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff Hard Drive Productions, which produces, markets and distributes adult
entertainment products, has filed a lawsuit against 53 Doe defendants alleging copyright
infringement. On August 3, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Revised Ex Parte Application to
Take Expedited Discovery. On October 14, 2011, the Doe defendant associated with Internet
Protocol (“IP”) address 68.99.178.9 filed a Motion to Quash a subpoena issued to Defendant’s
Internet Service provider (“ISP”), Cox Communications.
Plaintiff argues in its opposition to the motion to quash that the subpoena at issue was issued
out of the Northern District of Georgia. The subpoena is not attached to the motion or the
opposition. Accordingly, no later than November 28, 2011, Plaintiff shall file a declaration
attaching the subpoena or, if the subpoena is not available, explaining the basis for Plaintiff’s
statement that the subpoena at issue was issued from the Northern District of Georgia.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 15, 2011
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge