Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 31 Stipulation filed by Finisar Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57409) Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202284) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 2 Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122 Tel: 650.843.4000 Fax: 650.843.4001 E-mail: djjohnson@morganlewis.com E-mail: mlyons@morganlewis.com 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION 8 COOLEY LLP THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR. (SBN 80065) 101 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5800 Tel.: 415.693.2000 Fax: 415.693.2222 E-mail: tfriel@cooley.com JAMES P. BROGAN (SBN 155906) SARAH J. GUSKE (SBN 232467) 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900 Broomfield, CO 80021-8023 Tel.: 720.566.5000 Fax: 720.566.4099 E-mail: jbrogan@cooley.com E-mail: sguske@cooley.com 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC. 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 CASE NO. 3:11-cv-02361 EMC 17 18 OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, INC., 19 Plaintiffs, 20 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 21 22 FINISAR CORPORATION Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC 1 It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiffs OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC., 2 OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., and Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION 3 by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice and that the 5 parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 6 Dated: January 6, 2012 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 7 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 8 9 By /s/ Michael J. Lyons Michael J. Lyons Attorneys for Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION 10 11 12 13 Dated: January 6, 2012 COOLEY LLP 14 By /s/ Sarah Guske Sarah Guske Attorneys for Plaintiffs OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC., OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., 15 16 17 18 FILER’S ATTESTATION 19 20 21 22 23 I, Michael J. Lyons, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Sarah Guske concurs in this filing. Dated: January 6, 2012 24 By /s/ Michael J. Lyons Michael J. Lyons 25 26 Attorney for Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC 1 2 3 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: That the Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order is adopted by the Court. The 4 above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice, and the parties shall bear their own costs and 5 attorneys’ fees. 12 R NIA FO LI ER H 11 RT 10 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN n UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE M. Che Edward Judge NO 9 1/11 Dated: ________________, 2012 DERED O OR IT IS S A 8 UNIT ED 7 S The Clerk shall close the file. RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ORGAN , L EWIS & B OCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW PALO ALTO 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?