Oplink Communications Inc et al v. Finisar Corporation
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 31 Stipulation filed by Finisar Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57409)
Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202284)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122
Tel: 650.843.4000
Fax: 650.843.4001
E-mail: djjohnson@morganlewis.com
E-mail: mlyons@morganlewis.com
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
FINISAR CORPORATION
8
COOLEY LLP
THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR. (SBN 80065)
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Tel.: 415.693.2000
Fax: 415.693.2222
E-mail: tfriel@cooley.com
JAMES P. BROGAN (SBN 155906)
SARAH J. GUSKE (SBN 232467)
380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900
Broomfield, CO 80021-8023
Tel.: 720.566.5000
Fax: 720.566.4099
E-mail: jbrogan@cooley.com
E-mail: sguske@cooley.com
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
and
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC.
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-02361 EMC
17
18
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and
OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS
PRODUCTS, INC.,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
21
22
FINISAR CORPORATION
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC
1
It is hereby stipulated between Plaintiffs OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
2
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC., and Defendant FINISAR CORPORATION
3
by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
4
41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice and that the
5
parties shall bear their own costs and attorney’s fees.
6
Dated: January 6, 2012
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
7
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
8
9
By /s/ Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons
Attorneys for Defendant
FINISAR CORPORATION
10
11
12
13
Dated: January 6, 2012
COOLEY LLP
14
By /s/ Sarah Guske
Sarah Guske
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
OPTICAL COMMUNICATION
PRODUCTS, INC.,
15
16
17
18
FILER’S ATTESTATION
19
20
21
22
23
I, Michael J. Lyons, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
file this Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order
45.X.B, I hereby attest that Sarah Guske concurs in this filing.
Dated: January 6, 2012
24
By /s/ Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons
25
26
Attorney for Defendant
FINISAR CORPORATION
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC
1
2
3
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
That the Stipulation of Dismissal and [Proposed] Order is adopted by the Court. The
4
above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice, and the parties shall bear their own costs and
5
attorneys’ fees.
12
R NIA
FO
LI
ER
H
11
RT
10
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
n
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
M. Che
Edward
Judge
NO
9
1/11
Dated: ________________, 2012
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
8
UNIT
ED
7
S
The Clerk shall close the file.
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PALO ALTO
2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02361 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?