George Hague as Trustee of the Hague Family Irrevocable Trust et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 56


Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 GEORGE HAGUE, et al., 6 7 8 Plaintiff, NO. C11-02366 TEH v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED Defendant. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 On October 24, 2011, a case management conference was scheduled to occur at 12 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor of the U.S. District Courthouse in San Francisco. At 13 that meeting, counsel for the Plaintiff failed to appear. Due to counsel’s failure to appear, the 14 case management conference had to be continued. Furthermore, counsel for Defendant 15 Wells Fargo Bank was forced to wait, following a morning hearing at the courthouse, until 16 after 2:00 p.m. in anticipation of appearing at the case management conference, only to be 17 told the conference would have to be continued due to Plaintiff’s counsel’s failure to appear. 18 The Court hereby ORDERS Jason W. Estavillo, counsel for the Plaintiff, to SHOW 19 CAUSE why monetary sanctions should not be imposed. Counsel may submit any written 20 response to this order on or before November 14, 2011, and the matter will be heard on 21 November 28, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. with the motion to dismiss, and the continued case 22 management conference. Defendant’s counsel may request attorney fees for his time lost due 23 to Plaintiff’s counsel’s absence. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 10/25/2011 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?