Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 4/20/2012. Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 4 Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436) Dimuth C. Amaratunge, Esq. (SBN 237158) MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC 2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350 Newport Beach, California 92663 Phone: (949) 486-1888 Fax: (949) 486-1889 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ) Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC ) ) ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME ) ) LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF ) ) AMERICA CORPORATION; and ) DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN, 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case 3 4 Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 5 1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on February 6 7 27 24, 2012 is continued to April 24, 2012; and 27 8 2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to April 24, 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. S ER H 17 18 en d M. Ch dwar Judge E FO RT 16 Honorable Edward M. Chen NO 15 D RDERE IS SO O By: _____________________________ IT LI 14 2/21 Dated: __________________, 2012 R NIA 13 RT U O 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 11 2012. UNIT ED 10 N F D IS T IC T O R 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?