Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2012. Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/31/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)

Download PDF
4 Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436) Dimuth C. Amaratunge, Esq. (SBN 237158) MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC 2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350 Newport Beach, California 92663 Phone: (949) 486-1888 Fax: (949) 486-1889 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME ) ) LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF ) ) AMERICA CORPORATION; and ) DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN, Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER DATE: September 7, 2012 TIME: 9:00 a.m. CTRM: 5 Honorable Edward M. Chen 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case 3 4 Management Conference and the Deadline to Dismiss Case In Its Entirety, IT IS 5 6 HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on September 7 26 8 7, 2012 is continued to October 9, 2012; and 9 2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to October 9, .C dward M Judge E ER H 18 RT 17 Honorable Edward eM. Chen h n NO 16 8/31 Dated: __________________, 2012 19 R NIA 15 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO By: _____________________________ FO 14 LI 13 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. S 12 2012. UNIT ED 11 A 10 N D IS T IC T R 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?