Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2012. Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/31/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
4
Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436)
Dimuth C. Amaratunge, Esq. (SBN 237158)
MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC
2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350
Newport Beach, California 92663
Phone: (949) 486-1888
Fax: (949) 486-1889
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan
1
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS )
CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME )
)
LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF )
)
AMERICA CORPORATION; and
)
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
)
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN,
Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DATE: September 7, 2012
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CTRM: 5
Honorable Edward M. Chen
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case
3
4
Management Conference and the Deadline to Dismiss Case In Its Entirety, IT IS
5
6
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on September
7
26
8
7, 2012 is continued to October 9, 2012; and
9
2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to October 9,
.C
dward M
Judge E
ER
H
18
RT
17
Honorable Edward eM. Chen
h n
NO
16
8/31
Dated: __________________, 2012
19
R NIA
15
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
By: _____________________________
FO
14
LI
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
12
2012.
UNIT
ED
11
A
10
N
D IS T IC T
R
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?