Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2012)
4
Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436)
MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC
2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350
Newport Beach, California 92663
Phone: (949) 486-1888
Fax: (949) 486-1889
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan
1
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS )
CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME )
)
LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF )
)
AMERICA CORPORATION; and
)
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
)
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN,
Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DATE: October 26, 2012
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CTRM: 5
Honorable Edward M. Chen
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case
Management Conference and the Deadline to Dismiss Case In Its Entirety, IT IS
5
6
7
8
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on October
January 3, 2013 at 9;00 a.m.
26, 2012 is continued to December 28, 2012; and
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
S
AS M
dward
Judge E
By: _____________________________
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
Honorable EdwardFI Chen
ODI M.
17
RT
18
ER
n
M. Che
H
19
R NIA
Dated: __________________, 2012
UNIT
ED
16
October 19
NO
15
RT
U
O
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
12
28, 2012.
LI
11
2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to December
A
10
N
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?