Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012)
4
Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436)
MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC
2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350
Newport Beach, California 92663
Phone: (949) 486-1888
Fax: (949) 486-1889
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan
1
2
3
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS )
CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME )
)
LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF )
)
AMERICA CORPORATION; and
)
DOES 1-100, inclusive,
)
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN,
Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DATE: January 3, 2013
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CTRM: 5
Honorable Edward M. Chen
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case
3
4
Management Conference and the Deadline to Dismiss Case In Its Entirety, IT IS
5
6
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on January 3,
7
7
8
2013 is continued to March 8, 2013; and
7
9
2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to March 8,
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
19
hen
ER
FO
rd M. C
dwa
Judge E
H
18
RT
17
Honorable Edward M. Chen
NO
16
12/21
Dated: __________________, 2012
LI
15
D
RDERE
S SO O IED
IT I
DIF
By: _____________________________
AS MO
R NIA
14
RT
U
O
13
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
12
2013.
UNIT
ED
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?