Ravan et al v. American Mortgage Express Corp et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND THE DEADLINE TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY filed by Mehdi Ravan, Ali Ravan Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2012)

Download PDF
4 Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436) MATRIX LAW FIRM, APC 2901 West Coast Hwy., Ste. 350 Newport Beach, California 92663 Phone: (949) 486-1888 Fax: (949) 486-1889 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Mehdi Ravan and Ali Ravan 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORP; BANK OF AMERICA HOME ) ) LOANS SERVICING, L.P.; BANK OF ) ) AMERICA CORPORATION; and ) DOES 1-100, inclusive, ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) MEHDI RAVAN and ALI RAVAN, Case No.: 3:11-CV-02371-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER DATE: January 3, 2013 TIME: 9:00 a.m. CTRM: 5 Honorable Edward M. Chen 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue the Case 3 4 Management Conference and the Deadline to Dismiss Case In Its Entirety, IT IS 5 6 HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Case Management Conference currently set to be heard on January 3, 7 7 8 2013 is continued to March 8, 2013; and 7 9 2) The deadline to dismiss the case in its entirety is continued to March 8, 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. S 19 hen ER FO rd M. C dwa Judge E H 18 RT 17 Honorable Edward M. Chen NO 16 12/21 Dated: __________________, 2012 LI 15 D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF By: _____________________________ AS MO R NIA 14 RT U O 13 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 12 2013. UNIT ED 11 N F D IS T IC T O R 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?