Johnson v. Astrue
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 . Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/7/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
*E-Filed 12/7/11*
1
2
3
MELINDA L. HAAG CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
ELIZABETH BARRY, CSBN 203314
Special Assistant United States Attorney
4
5
6
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8972
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Elizabeth.Barry@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
HORACE JOHNSON,
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of
)
Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)
CASE NO.: C-3:11-cv-02377-RS
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE NOTICE, MOTION,
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval
20
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension, or until January 6, 2012, in which to file his
21
Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in
22
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
23
This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time in this matter.
24
25
26
27
28
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 7, 2011
/s/ Tony Arjo
(as authorized via e-mail)
TONY ARJO
Attorney for Plaintiff
1
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
2
Dated: December 7, 2011
3
4
By /s/ Elizabeth Barry
ELIZABETH BARRY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
5
6
ORDER
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
12/7/11
DATED:________________________
_________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?