Panico v. Thermea et al
Filing
134
ORDER Granting Motion for Order Approving Minor's Compromise by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MELISSA PANICO, et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-02378-EDL
Plaintiffs,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
12
13
MILES INDUSTRIES LTD.,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ORDER APPROVING MINOR'S
COMPROMISE
Defendant.
14
15
On October 14, 2014, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order Approving
16
Minor’s Compromise. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ Motion.
17
The gross amount or value of the settlement, including the portion dedicated to the claims of the
18
minors, is $1,290,000.00. Defendant shall disburse the proceeds of this settlement in the
19
following manner:
20
1. $719,514.00 is to be placed in a purchased single premium annuity pursuant to the provisions
21
outlined in the Petition on behalf of and for the sole benefit of claimant Signe Whelan;
22
2. $80,500.00 is to be placed in a purchased single premium annuity pursuant to the provisions of
23
the Petition on behalf of and for the sole benefit of claimant Oscar Whelan;
24
3. Attorney’s fees in the total amount of $216,621.50 payable to Cory Watson Crowder &
25
DeGaris;
26
4. Costs in the total amount of $90,000.00 payable to the firms of Carter Wolden Curtis, LLP,
27
Cory Watson Crowder & DeGaris, and the Arnold Law Firm; and
28
5. $183,364.50 is to be paid to Melissa Panico, individually.
1
2
3
4
5
6. There are no liens for medical, hospital, ambulance, nursing or other like expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 20, 2014
______________________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?