Ortiz v. Cate et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/29/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMAL DANWELL ORTIZ, NO. C 11-2380 WHA (PR) 7 Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 8 v. 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 MATTHEW L. CATE; D. FOSTION; D. STARK; G.D. LEWIS; P.T. SMITH; CRUISE; R. BELL; M.J. NIMROD; DR. GLINES; V. COMPELLO; OFFICER TRIMM; OFFICER CARDENAS, 13 Defendants. / 14 15 On July 1, 2011, plaintiff's civil rights complaint was dismissed for failure to present a 16 cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. He has 17 failed to do so. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. 18 Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to 19 amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary). The 20 clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: August 29 , 2011. 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.11\ORTIZ2380.DSM.wpd WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?