Ortiz v. Cate et al
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/29/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMAL DANWELL ORTIZ,
NO. C 11-2380 WHA (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
MATTHEW L. CATE; D. FOSTION;
D. STARK; G.D. LEWIS; P.T. SMITH;
CRUISE; R. BELL; M.J. NIMROD;
DR. GLINES; V. COMPELLO;
OFFICER TRIMM; OFFICER
On July 1, 2011, plaintiff's civil rights complaint was dismissed for failure to present a
cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. He has
failed to do so. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v.
Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to
amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary). The
clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?