Ortiz v. Cate et al

Filing 7

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 8/29/11. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
JAMAL DANWELL ORTIZ,

NO. C 11-2380 WHA (PR)

7
Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

8
v.
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

MATTHEW L. CATE; D. FOSTION;
D. STARK; G.D. LEWIS; P.T. SMITH;
CRUISE; R. BELL; M.J. NIMROD;
DR. GLINES; V. COMPELLO;
OFFICER TRIMM; OFFICER
CARDENAS,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

On July 1, 2011, plaintiff's civil rights complaint was dismissed for failure to present a

16

cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. He has

17

failed to do so. This case is accordingly DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v.

18

Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to

19

amend and plaintiff does not amend, further district court determination is necessary). The

20

clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
Dated: August

29

, 2011.

23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.11\ORTIZ2380.DSM.wpd

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE