Kaur et al v. Barrett

Filing 11

ORDER Granting re 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICFE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/8/2011. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2011)

Case3:11-cv-02392-EDL Document10

Filed09/06/11 Page1 of 2

JOSEPH J. SIGUENZA, ESQ. (SBN92327)
LAW OFFICES OF ASHWANI K. BHAKHRI
1299 Bayshore Hwy., Ste. 208
Burlingame, CA 94010
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BHAJAN KAUR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

NO. 3:11-CV-2392
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
_________________________

ROBIN BARRETT, Field Office
Director, USCIS San Francisco,
CA., et al.,
Defendants.

_________________________________/

The instant action filed by plaintiffs, challenges the
delay in the adjudication of a pending I-485 Application(s)
for Adjustment of Status, pursuant to a previous grant of
asylum to lead plaintiff, and subsequent approved I-730
Petitions on behalf of co-plaintiffs.

Since the filing of

the Complaint, the parties have been notified that USCIS has

Case3:11-cv-02392-EDL Document10

Filed09/06/11 Page2 of 2

1

taken affirmative action in concluding the processing of said

2

Application(s).

3
4

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully moves for an order of
voluntary dismissal of the above-entitled action, without

5

prejudice.
6

Dated: 09/06/11
7

LAW OFFICES OF ASHWANI K. BHAKHRI
8

BY __s/ JOSEPH J. SIGUENZA___________
JOSEPH J. SIGUENZA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

ORDER
PURSUANT to plaintiffs’ motion and for the reasons
Stated therein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action
Be dismissed without prejudice.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17

Dated: _

18
19

____________________________________

September 8, 2011
_____________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25

2