Stowe v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION AND ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice between Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union LLC. Transunion, LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/05/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: ahamm@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 11 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com 12 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 8 9 10 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 SAN FRANCISO DIVISION ANNA STOWE, an individual, Plaintiffs, vs. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANSUNION, LLC; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, L.L.C.; LA CURACAO; and TOPAZ FINANCIAL SERVICE; Defendants. 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:11-cv-02428-TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC Plaintiff Anna Stowe 24 by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have been 25 compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff cause against Trans Union only should be 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC 3:11-CV-02428-TEH Page 1 of 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 4 Date: January 4, 2012 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ Rizza D. Gonzales (with consent) Edward O. Lear, Esq. (132699) Rizza D. Gonzales, Esq. (268118) Century Law Group, LLP 5200 West Century Boulevard, Suite 345 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Telephone: 310-642-6900 Fax: 310-642-6910 E-Mail: lear@centurylawgroup.com woodford@centurylawgroup.com Counsel for Anna Stowe 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Date: January 4, 2012 /s/ Angela L. Hamm Angela L. Hamm, Esq. (IN #21662-29) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) Schuckit & Associates, P.C. 4545 Northwestern Drive Zionsville, IN 46077 Telephone: 317-363-2400 Fax: 317-363-2257 E-Mail: ahamm@schuckitlaw.com Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 23 Michael W. Bien, Esq. (CSB #96891) Sumana Cooppan, Esq. (CSB # 267967) Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-433-6830 Fax: 415-433-7104 E-Mail: mbien@rbg-law.com scooppan@rbg-law.com 24 Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC 3:11-CV-02428-TEH Page 2 of 3 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Trans Union, LLC is 2 dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Anna Stowe and Defendant Trans Union, LLC shall each 3 S 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 FO ER LI DISTRIBUTION TO: H 9 RT 8 ____________________________________ JUDGE, United States DistricterCourt, Northern n end so District of Californialton E. H dge The Ju NO 7 R NIA 01/05/2012 Date: ________________________ A 6 UNIT ED 5 RT U O 4 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C Edward O. Lear, Esq. lear@centurylawgroup.com Rizza Gonzales, Esq. gonzales@centurylawgroup.com Thomas P. Quinn, Esq. tquinn@nokesquinn.com Lewis Perling, Esq. lperling@kslaw.com Katherine Anne Klimkowski, Esq. kaklimkowski@jonesday.com Michael W. Bien, Esq. mbien@rbg-law.com Sumana Cooppan, Esq. scooppan@rbg-law.com Angela L. Hamm, Esq. ahamm@schuckitlaw.com Scott Douglas Pinsky, Esq. spinsky@earthlink.net 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC 3:11-CV-02428-TEH Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?