Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY LETTER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 04/10/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, 12 individually and on behalf of others similarly 13 situated, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 v. ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY LETTER OCLARO, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 140 Defendants. 17 18 IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE 19 LITIGATION, 20 21 22 23 No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC) and related consolidated action (Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC)) (Derivative Action) This Document Relates to: Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al., 11-cv-02448-EMC (NC) 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC) ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC) (Related cases: 11-cv-03214 EMC (NC) 11-cv-03322 EMC (NC) 11-cv-03668 EMC (NC)) (Derivative Action) 1 Plaintiffs filed a discovery letter seeking an order requiring defendants to 2 immediately identify Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees. Dkt. No. 140. The Court hereby 3 orders defendants to submit a response to plaintiffs’ letter by 12:00 p.m. on April 11, 2013. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Date: April 10, 2013 6 _________________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC) ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?