Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al
Filing
141
ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY LETTER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 04/10/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY,
12 individually and on behalf of others similarly
13
situated,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
v.
ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE
TO DISCOVERY LETTER
OCLARO, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 140
Defendants.
17
18 IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE
19
LITIGATION,
20
21
22
23
No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
and related consolidated action
(Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC
(NC))
(Derivative Action)
This Document Relates to:
Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al.,
11-cv-02448-EMC (NC)
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE
Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC)
(Related cases:
11-cv-03214 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03322 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03668 EMC (NC))
(Derivative Action)
1
Plaintiffs filed a discovery letter seeking an order requiring defendants to
2 immediately identify Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees. Dkt. No. 140. The Court hereby
3 orders defendants to submit a response to plaintiffs’ letter by 12:00 p.m. on April 11, 2013.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Date: April 10, 2013
6
_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER TO SUBMIT RESPONSE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?