Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al
Filing
143
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 04/11/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY,
12 individually and on behalf of others similarly
13
situated,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
v.
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER
OCLARO, INC., et al.,
18 IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION,
20
21
22
23
Re: Dkt. Nos. 140, 142
Defendants.
17
19
No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
and related consolidated action
(Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC
(NC))
(Derivative Action)
This Document Relates to:
Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al.,
11-cv-02448-EMC (NC)
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER
Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC)
(Related cases:
11-cv-03214 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03322 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03668 EMC (NC))
(Derivative Action)
1
After considering plaintiffs’ discovery letter seeking an order requiring defendants to
2 identify Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees, Dkt. No. 140, and defendants’ opposition, Dkt.
3 No. 142, the Court hereby denies plaintiffs’ request. The Court notes that it expects counsel
4 to work out cooperatively such issues to avoid unnecessary court intervention.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Date: April 11, 2013
7
_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?