Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al

Filing 143

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 04/11/2013. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY,

12 individually and on behalf of others similarly
13

situated,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16

v.

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER

OCLARO, INC., et al.,

18 IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE
LITIGATION,

20
21
22
23

Re: Dkt. Nos. 140, 142

Defendants.

17

19

No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
and related consolidated action
(Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC
(NC))
(Derivative Action)

This Document Relates to:

Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al.,
11-cv-02448-EMC (NC)

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER

Lead Case No. 11-cv-03176 EMC (NC)
(Related cases:
11-cv-03214 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03322 EMC (NC)
11-cv-03668 EMC (NC))
(Derivative Action)

1

After considering plaintiffs’ discovery letter seeking an order requiring defendants to

2 identify Rule 30(b)(6) deposition designees, Dkt. No. 140, and defendants’ opposition, Dkt.
3 No. 142, the Court hereby denies plaintiffs’ request. The Court notes that it expects counsel
4 to work out cooperatively such issues to avoid unnecessary court intervention.
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Date: April 11, 2013

7

_________________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02448 EMC (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER

2