Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Connecticut Laborers' Pension Fund. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/17/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) Post Montgomery Center 3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 5 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com – and – 6 JULIE A. KEARNS (246949) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 7 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 8 619/231-7423 (fax) jkearns@rgrdlaw.com 9 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 10 [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 CURTIS AND CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, ) No. C11-02448-EMC 14 Individually and on Behalf of All Others ) and related consolidated action Similarly Situated, ) (Lead Case No. C11-3176-EMC) 15 ) (Derivative Action) Plaintiffs, ) 16 ) vs. ) 17 ) OCLARO, INC., et al., ) 18 ) Defendants. ) 19 ) ) Lead Case No. C11-3176-EMC In re OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE 20 LITIGATION ) (Derivative Action) ) 21 ) ) This Document Relates To: 22 ) ) C11-02448-EMC. 23 ) 24 25 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 26 27 28 777094_1 1 The parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulated 2 agreement regarding the deadline for lead plaintiff to file its third amended complaint. 3 WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012, the Court issued an Order Granting Defendants’ 4 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“September 21 Order”) (Dkt. No. 79); 5 WHEREAS, the September 21 Order provides that lead plaintiff must file a third amended 6 complaint no later than 30 days from the date of entry of the September 21 Order, or by October 22, 7 2012; 8 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2012, lead plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File Motion for 9 Reconsideration of September 21, 2012 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second 10 Amended Complaint (“Motion for Leave”) pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-9 (Dkt. No. 81); 11 WHEREAS, on October 9, 2012 the clerk issued a Notice that the Court had set a date for 12 hearing on the Motion for Leave for November 9, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. (Dkt. No. 83); 13 WHEREAS, it is lead plaintiff’s position that it is in the best interest of all parties to await 14 guidance from the Court in connection with lead plaintiff’s Motion for Leave before filing a third 15 amended complaint; 16 WHEREAS, counsel for lead plaintiff has requested an agreement from defendants extending 17 the date upon which lead plaintiff must file the third amended complaint until after the Court rules 18 on the Motion for Leave; and 19 WHEREAS, counsel for defendants, in light of the request, has agreed to enter into a 20 stipulation, subject to the approval of the Court, extending the date for lead plaintiff to file a third 21 amended complaint until after the court rules on the Motion for Leave. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 777094_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - C11-02448-EMC -1- 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 2 The deadline for lead plaintiff to file its third amended complaint shall be extended until 14 3 days after the Court issues an order on the Motion for Leave. 4 DATED: October 16, 2012 5 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 6 7 8 9 10 11 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 14 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP JULIE A. KEARNS 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) 15 Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 16 ROBERT M. CHEVERIE & ASSOCIATES GREGORY S. CAMPORA Commerce Center One 333 E. River Drive, Suite 101 East Hartford, CT 06108 Telephone: 860/290-9610 860/290-9611 (fax) 12 13 17 18 19 20 21 22 HOLZER HOLZER & FISTEL, LLC MICHAEL I. FISTEL, JR. 200 Ashford Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30338 Telephone: 770/392-0090 770/392-0029 (fax) 23 24 25 26 DYER & BERENS LLP ROBERT J. DYER III JEFFREY A. BERENS 303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: 303/861-1764 303/395-0393 (fax) 27 Additional Counsel for Plaintiff 28 777094_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - C11-02448-EMC -2- 1 DATED: October 16, 2012 ALSTON & BIRD LLP GIDON M. CAINE 2 3 s/ Gidon M. Caine GIDON M. CAINE 4 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008 Telephone: 650/838-2000 650/838-2001 (fax) 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 9 I, Shawn A. Williams, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 10 file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend the Deadline for Plaintiff to File Third Amended 11 Complaint. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Gidon M. Caine has 12 concurred in this filing. 13 DATED: October 16, 2012 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS 14 15 * 16 25 S R NIA FO LI ER n M. Che H 24 RT 23 dward Judge E NO 22 RDER OO IT IS S A 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT D E JUDGE UNIT ED 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. October 17, 2012 DATED: RT U O 19 * ORDER 17 18 * N D IS T IC T R OF C 26 27 28 777094_1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT - C11-02448-EMC -3- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October 16, 2012, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to 4 the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I 5 caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non6 CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. 7 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 8 foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 16, 2012. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 777094_1 s/ Shawn A. Williams SHAWN A. WILLIAMS ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) E-mail: shawnw@rgrdlaw.com CAND-ECF- Page 1 of 1 Mailing Information for a Case 3:11-cv-02448-EMC Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. Gidon M. Caine gidon.caine@alston.com,tina.mehr@alston.com,kathy.kirk@alston.com Jessica Perry Corley jessica.corley@alston.com Michael I. Fistel , Jr mfistel@holzerlaw.com Frank James Johnson frankj@johnsonandweaver.com,davide@johnsonandweaver.com,brett@johnsonandweaver.com,shelbyr@johnsonandweaver.com Julie A. Kearns jkearns@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Brian O. O'Mara bo'mara@csgrr.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Mark Punzalan mpunzalan@finkelsteinthompson.com,arivas@finkestienthompson.com,srenwick@finkelsteinthompson.com,bassad@finkelsteinthompson.com,rrivas@finkelsteinthompson.com,ssh Darren Jay Robbins e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com Elizabeth Patz Skola elizabeth.skola@alston.com,chuck.mattson@alston.com David Conrad Walton davew@rgrdlaw.com Shawn A. Williams shawnw@rgrdlaw.com,khuang@rgrdlaw.com,erinj@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. Robert J. Dyer Dyer & Berens LLP 303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80203 , III https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/MailList.pl?101797288293464-L_1_0-1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?