Westley et al v. Oclaro, Inc. et al

Filing 89

STIPULATION AND ORDER 88 EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINE RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION filed by Alain Couder, Jerry Turin, Oclaro, Inc. Responses due by 10/30/2012. Replies due by 11/16/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/11/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/24/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012) (bpf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-02448-EMC Document88 Filed10/23/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 GIDON M. CAINE (Cal. State Bar No. 188110) TINA MEHR (Cal. State Bar No. 275659) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 275 Middlefield Road Suite 150 Menlo Park, California 94025-4008 Telephone: (650) 838-2000 Facsimile: (650) 838-2001 gidon.caine@alston.com tina.mehr@alston.com JESSICA P. CORLEY (admitted pro hac vice) ALSTON & BIRD LLP One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 jessica.corley@alston.com Attorneys for Defendants OCLARO, INC., ALAIN COUDER, JERRY TURIN, and JAMES HAYNES 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 CURTIS and CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. OCLARO, INC., et al., Defendants. IN RE OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 24 This Document Relates to: 25 No. C11-2448 EMC 26 27 Case No. C11-2448 EMC and related consolidated action Lead Case No. C11-3176 EMC (Derivative Action) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Case3:11-cv-02448-EMC Document88 Filed10/23/12 Page2 of 3 1 2 WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012, the Court issued an order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“September 21 Order”) (Dkt. 79); 3 WHEREAS, on October 4, 2012, lead plaintiff’s filed a Motion for Leave to File Motion for 4 Reconsideration of September 21, 2012 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second 5 Amended Complaint (“Motion for Leave”) pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7- 9 (Dkt. 81); 6 7 WHEREAS, on October 9, 2012 the Court issued a Clerk’s Notice setting a date for hearing on the Motion for Leave for November 9, 2012 at 1:30 pm. (Dkt. 83); 8 9 WHEREAS, thereafter the Court instructed defendants to file an opposition to lead plaintiff’s Motion for Leave and lead plaintiff to file a reply in support of the Motion for Leave; and 10 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to enter into a stipulation, subject to the approval of the 11 Court, (1) rescheduling the hearing on the Motion for Leave to December 11, 2012 at 1:30 p.m., (2) 12 setting a deadline of October 30, 2012 for defendants to file an opposition to lead plaintiff’s Motion 13 for Leave, and (3) setting a deadline of November 16, 2012 for lead plaintiff to file a reply in support 14 of the Motion for Leave. 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 16 1. The hearing on lead plaintiff’s Motion for Leave is scheduled for December 11, 2012 at 17 1:30 p.m. 18 2. Defendants’ opposition to lead plaintiff’s Motion for Leave is due on October 30, 2012. 19 3. Lead plaintiff’s reply in support of the Motion for Leave is due on November 16, 2012. 20 DATED: October 23, 2012 21 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP ALSTON & BIRD LLP 22 27 By: _/s/ SHAWN A. WILIAMS _ By: _/s/ Gidon M. Caine _ SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (Cal. State Bar GIDON M. CAINE (Cal. State Bar No. 188110) No. 213113) TINA MEHR (Cal. State Bar. No. 275659) Post Montgomery Center 275 Middlefield Road One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 Suite 150 San Francisco, California 94104 Menlo Park, California 94025-4008 Telephone: (415) 288-4545 Telephone: (650) 838-2000 Facsimile (415) 288-4534 Facsimile: (650) 838-2001 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com gidon.caine@alston.com tina.mehr@alston.com 28 and 23 24 25 26 and 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Case3:11-cv-02448-EMC Document88 Filed10/23/12 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 JULIE A. KEARNS (Cal. State Bar No. 246949) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (619) 231-1058 Facsimile: (619) 231-7423 jkearns@rgrdlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs JESSICA P. CORLEY (pro hac vice) One Atlantic Center 1201 West Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 Telephone: (404) 881-7000 Facsimile: (404) 881-7777 jessica.corley@alston.com Counsel for Defendants Oclaro, Inc., Alain Couder, Jerry Turin 6 7 8 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 9 I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing 10 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Rescheduling Case Management Conference. Pursuant to General 11 Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Tina Mehr, attest that concurrence in the filing 12 of this document has been obtained. 13 DATED: OCTOBER 23, 2012 14 /S/ TINA MEHR TINA MEHR (CAL. STATE BAR NO. 275659) 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 O IT IS S O 21 n M. Che LI ER A H 24 RT 23 NO 22 dward Judge E R NIA HON. EDWARD M. CHEN United States DistrictDERED R Court Judge FO 20 UNIT ED 19 Octboer 24, 2012 DATED: ____________________ RT U O 18 S DISTRICT TE C TA __________________________________________ S 16 N F D IS T IC T O R C 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?