Alvarado et al v. Boicelli Cabinets, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Subsequent Case Management Conference filed by Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust Fund for California, Carpenters Annuity Trust Fund for Northern California, Carpent ers Training Trust Fund for Northern California, Carpenters Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, Robert Alvarado Further Case Management Conference set for 2/17/2012 AT 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/25/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BLYTHE MICKELSON, Bar No. 095506 LINDA BALDWIN JONES, Bar No. 178922 EZEKIEL D. CARDER, Bar No. 206537 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone (510) 337-1001 Fax (510) 337-1023 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. C-11-2461 JCS ROBERT ALVARADO, in his capacity as Trustee of the CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FOR CALIFORNIA; CARPENTERS VACATIONHOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; CARPENTERS ANNUITY TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and CARPENTERS TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOPSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, v. BOICELLI CABINETS, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-2461 JCS 1 The Parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby respectfully request that 2 Subsequent Case Management Conference scheduled for January 19, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. be 3 continued for an additional thirty (30) days to allow them time to finalize the settlement 4 documents. The Parties previously notified the Court that a settlement had been reached and the 5 Parties were in the process of preparing the settlement documents. The settlement documents 6 have been exchanged by Counsel, but have not been signed by the respective Parties. The Parties 7 believe the additional time will allow them to sufficient time to finalize the settlement. 8 Dated: January 19, 2012 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 9 10 By: 11 /s/ Ezekiel D. Carder EZEKIEL D. CARDER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 13 Dated: January 19, 2012 HANNIG LAW FIRM LLP 14 15 16 By: /s/ John H. Blake JOHN H. BLAKE Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-2461 JCS 1 S 7 NO RT 127274/652345 Judge Jo ER H 9 S seph C. R NIA UNIT ED _________________________________________ HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 8 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 5 pero FO 4 LI 3 Based upon the foregoing Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference, the is continued Court orders the continuance of the Subsequent Case Management Conference for thirty (30) to February 17, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. days, or as soon thereafter as a court date is available. In addition, the Court Orders: A 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD A Professional Corporation 1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 Alameda, California 94501 (510) 337-1001 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SUBSEQUENT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 11-2461 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?