Alicea v. Walgreen Co. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/14/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 REX DARRELL BERRY, State Bar No. 110219 BRIAN CRONE, State Bar No. 191731 BERRY & BLOCK LLP 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 415 Sacramento, CA 95833 (916) 564-2000 (916) 564-2024 FAX Attorneys for Defendant WALGREEN CO. 7 8 9 10 11 12 PAMELA PITT, State Bar No. 156395 MARIA BOURN, State Bar No. 269322 LAW OFFICE OF PAMELA PITT 22 Battery Street, Suite 1000 (415) 291-9251 (415) 291-9252 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROSA ALICEA 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 ROSA ALICEA, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 v. WALGREEN CO., GERALD T. WONG, and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-CV-02462-JCS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) All parties hereby stipulate that the action be dismissed with prejudice. 22 23 Dated: November 9, 2011 /s/ Pamela Pitt, Esq. Pamela Pitt Attorney for Plaintiff Rosa Alicea Dated: November 9, 2011 /s/ Brian Crone, Esq. Brian Crone Attorney for Defendant Walgreen Co. 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 11/14/11 Dated: ______________ UNIT ED NO Spero seph C. RT 4 Judge Jo ER A H 5 FO 3 R NIA _____________________________ Honorable Joseph C. Spero LI 2 S IT IS SO ORDERED. RT U O 1 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R C 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 Alicea v. Walgreens, et al. San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-11-507948 U.S.D.C., Northern District, Case No. 3:11-CV-02462-JCS 3 DECLARATION OF SERVICE 4 I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to or interested in this action. I am an employee of Berry & Block LLP, and my business address is 2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 415, Sacramento, CA 95833. On this day I caused to be served the following document(s): 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by placing follows: the original a true copy into sealed envelopes addressed and served as Attorney for Plaintiff Pamela Pitt LAW OFFICE OF PAMELA PITT 22 Battery Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 291-9251; Fax: (415) 291-9252 14 BY MAIL: I am familiar with this firm’s practice whereby the mail, after being placed in a designated area, is given fully prepaid postage and is then deposited with the U.S. Postal Service at Sacramento, California, after the close of the day’s business. 15 BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: I caused such envelope to be delivered by hand. 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BY OVERNIGHT COURIER: I caused such envelope to be placed for collection and delivery in accordance with standard overnight delivery procedures for delivery the next business day. BY FACSIMILE: I caused such documents(s) to be transmitted by facsimile transmission from (916) 564-2024 to the person(s) and facsimile transmission without number(s) shown about. The facsimile transmission was reported as complete without error and a transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. A true and correct copy of the transmission report will be attached to this proof of service after facsimile service is completed. BY FEDERAL ELECTRONIC FILING: I caused such document(s) to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing and copies of the document(s) to the parties. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 9, 2011, at Sacramento, California. 26 /s/ Jenny O’Shaughnessy Jenny O’Shaughnessy 27 28 29 3 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?