Stopa v. Clontz et al
Filing
32
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 31 Stipulation Regarding Temporary Stay.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KEVIN P. MUCK (CSB No. 120918)
kmuck@fenwick.com
CATHERINE KEVANE (CSB No. 215501)
ckevane@fenwick.com
MARIE C. BAFUS (CSB No. 258417)
mbafus@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 875-2300
Facsimile:
(415) 281-1350
Attorneys for Defendants
Steven Clontz, Gary Hromadko, Scott Kriens,
William Luby, Irving Lyons, III, Christopher
Paisley, Stephen Smith, Peter Van Camp and
nominal defendant Equinix, Inc.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MOUNTAIN VIEW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
14
JOSEPH STOPA, derivatively on behalf of
Nominal Defendant, EQUINIX, INC.,
Derivative Action
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 11-CV-02467-SC
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING TEMPORARY
STAY OF LITIGATION
vs.
STEVEN CLONTZ, GARY HROMADKO,
SCOTT KRIENS, WILLIAM LUBY,
IRVING LYONS, III, CHRISTOPHER
PAISLEY, STEPHEN SMITH, PETER VAN
CAMP,
20
Defendants.
21
and
22
EQUINIX, INC.,
23
Nominal Defendant.
24
25
This stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Joseph Stopa (“Plaintiff”) and
26
defendants Steven Clontz, Gary Hromadko, Scott Kriens, William Luby, Irving Lyons, III,
27
Christopher Paisley, Stephen Smith, Peter Van Camp and nominal defendant Equinix, Inc.
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION
CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC
1
2
(collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys of record;
WHEREAS, presently pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s putative shareholder
3
derivative action against certain officers and directors of Equinix, Inc. (“Equinix” or the
4
“Company”) and against nominal defendant Equinix;
5
WHEREAS, this action has been deemed related to a putative shareholder class action
6
complaint, entitled Cement Masons & Plasterers Joint Pension Trust v. Equinix, Inc., et al., Case
7
No. 11-CV-01016-SC (N.D. Cal.) (“Cement Masons”), which is currently pending in this Court
8
against Equinix and certain officers and directors under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
9
Act (“PSLRA”);
Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (“Amended Class Action Complaint”) on September 22,
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MOUNTAIN VIEW
WHEREAS, plaintiff in the Cement Masons case filed an Amended Complaint for
11
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
2011 and defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Cement Masons’ Amended Class Action
13
Complaint on November 7, 2011;
14
15
WHEREAS, the operative complaint in this action is an Amended Complaint filed on
December 14, 2011;
16
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court has entered orders on July 14,
17
2011 and October 18, 2011 temporarily staying proceedings in this action pending a ruling on the
18
motion to dismiss in Cement Masons;
19
WHEREAS, on March 2, 2012, this Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the
20
Cement Masons Amended Class Action Complaint and provided plaintiffs in the Cement Masons
21
action thirty (30) days within which to amend the Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Second
22
Amended Class Action Complaint”);
23
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties in Cement Masons, the court entered an
24
order extending the time in which the Cement Masons plaintiffs must file their Second Amended
25
Class Action Complaint until May 2, 2012;
26
WHEREAS, if the plaintiffs in Cement Masons choose to file the Second Amended Class
27
Action Complaint, defendants in Cement Masons intend to move to dismiss any such complaint;
28
WHEREAS, in an effort to assure consistent rulings and decisions, promote coordination
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION
2
CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC
1
between the related federal shareholder class action and this putative shareholder derivative
2
action, avoid needless motion practice, avoid unnecessary duplication of effort, and conserve the
3
Court’s and parties’ resources, the parties have agreed to continue the temporary stay of litigation
4
in the above-captioned action until thirty (30) days after either: (i) the plaintiffs in Cement
5
Masons file the Second Amended Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to
6
dismiss that Second Amended Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons
7
plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint
8
having been filed;
“Stipulation”) setting forth a briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty
11
(30) days after either of the following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MOUNTAIN VIEW
WHEREAS, the parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation (the
10
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
9
Amended Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second
13
Amended Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the
14
Second Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed;
15
WHEREAS, Defendants shall have no obligation to respond the to the Amended
16
Complaint in the above-captioned action until after the Stipulation on the briefing schedule is
17
filed;
18
19
20
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the
Parties, that:
1.
The parties agree to continue the temporary stay in the above-captioned action
21
until thirty (30) days after either (i) the plaintiffs in Cement Masons file the Second Amended
22
Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended
23
Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second
24
Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed.
25
2.
The parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation setting forth a
26
briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days after either of the
27
following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second Amended Class Action
28
Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended Class Action
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION
3
CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC
1
Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class
2
Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed.
3
3.
Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the Amended Complaint in the
4
above-captioned action until after the Stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule is filed.
5
Dated: March 27, 2012
6
FENWICK & WEST LLP
By:
/s/ Catherine Kevane
Catherine Kevane
7
FENWICK & WEST, LLP
8
Attorneys for Defendants Steven Clontz, Gary
Hromadko, Scott Kriens, William Luby, Irving
Lyons, III, Christopher Paisley, Stephen Smith,
Peter Van Camp and nominal defendant Equinix,
Inc.
9
10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MOUNTAIN VIEW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
Dated: March 27, 2012
13
GREEN WELLING, P.C.
14
By:
/s/ Robert S. Green
Robert S. Green
15
GREEN WELLING, P.C.
16
FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joseph Stopa
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all of the signatories concur in the filing
of this stipulation.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION
4
CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that:
3
1.
The parties agree to continue the temporary stay in the above-captioned action
4
until thirty (30) days after either (i) the plaintiffs in Cement Masons file the Second Amended
5
Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended
6
Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second
7
Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed.
8
9
2.
The parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation setting forth a
briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days after either of the
Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended Class Action
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MOUNTAIN VIEW
following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second Amended Class Action
11
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class
13
Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed.
14
15
3.
Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the Amended Complaint in the
above-captioned action until after the Stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule is filed.
16
17
April 2, 2012
Dated: __________________________
____________________________________
The Honorable Samuel Conti
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION
5
CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?