Stopa v. Clontz et al

Filing 32

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 31 Stipulation Regarding Temporary Stay.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KEVIN P. MUCK (CSB No. 120918) kmuck@fenwick.com CATHERINE KEVANE (CSB No. 215501) ckevane@fenwick.com MARIE C. BAFUS (CSB No. 258417) mbafus@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 Attorneys for Defendants Steven Clontz, Gary Hromadko, Scott Kriens, William Luby, Irving Lyons, III, Christopher Paisley, Stephen Smith, Peter Van Camp and nominal defendant Equinix, Inc. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 14 JOSEPH STOPA, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, EQUINIX, INC., Derivative Action 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 11-CV-02467-SC Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION vs. STEVEN CLONTZ, GARY HROMADKO, SCOTT KRIENS, WILLIAM LUBY, IRVING LYONS, III, CHRISTOPHER PAISLEY, STEPHEN SMITH, PETER VAN CAMP, 20 Defendants. 21 and 22 EQUINIX, INC., 23 Nominal Defendant. 24 25 This stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Joseph Stopa (“Plaintiff”) and 26 defendants Steven Clontz, Gary Hromadko, Scott Kriens, William Luby, Irving Lyons, III, 27 Christopher Paisley, Stephen Smith, Peter Van Camp and nominal defendant Equinix, Inc. 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC 1 2 (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective attorneys of record; WHEREAS, presently pending before this Court is Plaintiff’s putative shareholder 3 derivative action against certain officers and directors of Equinix, Inc. (“Equinix” or the 4 “Company”) and against nominal defendant Equinix; 5 WHEREAS, this action has been deemed related to a putative shareholder class action 6 complaint, entitled Cement Masons & Plasterers Joint Pension Trust v. Equinix, Inc., et al., Case 7 No. 11-CV-01016-SC (N.D. Cal.) (“Cement Masons”), which is currently pending in this Court 8 against Equinix and certain officers and directors under the Private Securities Litigation Reform 9 Act (“PSLRA”); Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (“Amended Class Action Complaint”) on September 22, 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW WHEREAS, plaintiff in the Cement Masons case filed an Amended Complaint for 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 2011 and defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Cement Masons’ Amended Class Action 13 Complaint on November 7, 2011; 14 15 WHEREAS, the operative complaint in this action is an Amended Complaint filed on December 14, 2011; 16 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the Court has entered orders on July 14, 17 2011 and October 18, 2011 temporarily staying proceedings in this action pending a ruling on the 18 motion to dismiss in Cement Masons; 19 WHEREAS, on March 2, 2012, this Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the 20 Cement Masons Amended Class Action Complaint and provided plaintiffs in the Cement Masons 21 action thirty (30) days within which to amend the Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Second 22 Amended Class Action Complaint”); 23 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties in Cement Masons, the court entered an 24 order extending the time in which the Cement Masons plaintiffs must file their Second Amended 25 Class Action Complaint until May 2, 2012; 26 WHEREAS, if the plaintiffs in Cement Masons choose to file the Second Amended Class 27 Action Complaint, defendants in Cement Masons intend to move to dismiss any such complaint; 28 WHEREAS, in an effort to assure consistent rulings and decisions, promote coordination STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION 2 CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC 1 between the related federal shareholder class action and this putative shareholder derivative 2 action, avoid needless motion practice, avoid unnecessary duplication of effort, and conserve the 3 Court’s and parties’ resources, the parties have agreed to continue the temporary stay of litigation 4 in the above-captioned action until thirty (30) days after either: (i) the plaintiffs in Cement 5 Masons file the Second Amended Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to 6 dismiss that Second Amended Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons 7 plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint 8 having been filed; “Stipulation”) setting forth a briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty 11 (30) days after either of the following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW WHEREAS, the parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation (the 10 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 9 Amended Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second 13 Amended Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the 14 Second Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed; 15 WHEREAS, Defendants shall have no obligation to respond the to the Amended 16 Complaint in the above-captioned action until after the Stipulation on the briefing schedule is 17 filed; 18 19 20 IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the Parties, that: 1. The parties agree to continue the temporary stay in the above-captioned action 21 until thirty (30) days after either (i) the plaintiffs in Cement Masons file the Second Amended 22 Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended 23 Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second 24 Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed. 25 2. The parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation setting forth a 26 briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days after either of the 27 following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second Amended Class Action 28 Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended Class Action STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION 3 CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC 1 Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class 2 Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed. 3 3. Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the Amended Complaint in the 4 above-captioned action until after the Stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule is filed. 5 Dated: March 27, 2012 6 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Catherine Kevane Catherine Kevane 7 FENWICK & WEST, LLP 8 Attorneys for Defendants Steven Clontz, Gary Hromadko, Scott Kriens, William Luby, Irving Lyons, III, Christopher Paisley, Stephen Smith, Peter Van Camp and nominal defendant Equinix, Inc. 9 10 11 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Dated: March 27, 2012 13 GREEN WELLING, P.C. 14 By: /s/ Robert S. Green Robert S. Green 15 GREEN WELLING, P.C. 16 FEDERMAN & SHERWOOD Attorneys for Plaintiff Joseph Stopa 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all of the signatories concur in the filing of this stipulation. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION 4 CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that: 3 1. The parties agree to continue the temporary stay in the above-captioned action 4 until thirty (30) days after either (i) the plaintiffs in Cement Masons file the Second Amended 5 Class Action Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended 6 Class Action Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second 7 Amended Class Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed. 8 9 2. The parties to the above-captioned action will file a stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days after either of the Complaint and the Court rules on any motion to dismiss that Second Amended Class Action 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW following occurs: (i) the Cement Masons plaintiffs file the Second Amended Class Action 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 Complaint; or (ii) the time for the Cement Masons plaintiffs to file the Second Amended Class 13 Action Complaint lapses without any such complaint having been filed. 14 15 3. Defendants shall have no obligation to respond to the Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action until after the Stipulation setting forth a briefing schedule is filed. 16 17 April 2, 2012 Dated: __________________________ ____________________________________ The Honorable Samuel Conti 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE TEMPORARY STAY OF LITIGATION 5 CASE NO. 11-CV-02467-SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?