Hood v. Ryactive Corporation et al
Filing
5
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/22/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2011)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Northern District of California
3
4
JOSHUA L. HOOD
5
No. C 11-02487 MEJ
Plaintiff(s),
v.
6
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION
FORM
RYACTIVE CORPORATION
7
8
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
9
10
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Upon review of the record in
this action, the Court notes that the parties have not filed written consents to magistrate judge
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for all
13
purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district
14
court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of
15
final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate
16
judge may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same
17
manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
18
You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and
19
disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the court, by way of the enclosed form (or the
20
form on the Court's website), whether they consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction or request
21
reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. The parties shall inform the Court of their
22
decision by July 7, 2011.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 22, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
6
7
8
No. C 11-02487 MEJ
JOSHUA L. HOOD
5
Plaintiff(s),
CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OR
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT
vs.
RYACTIVE CORPORATION
Defendant(s).
9
/
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party hereby
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in this
13
case, including trial, and order the entry of final judgment, and voluntarily waives the right to
14
proceed before a United States District Judge.
15
16
Dated:________________________
Signed by: ____________________________
17
Counsel for:_____________________________
18
19
20
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United
22
States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to
23
a United States District Judge.
24
Dated: ________________________
Signed by: _____________________________
25
26
Counsel for: ____________________________
27
28
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
5
JOSHUA L. HOOD
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
Case Number: 11-02487 MEJ
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
RYACTIVE CORPORATION
Defendant.
/
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
13
14
15
16
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 22, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
Joshua L. Hood
1504 Bay Road, Apt. 2001
Miami Beach, FL 33139
17
18
19
Dated: June 22, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?