Schneider v. Space System/Loral, Inc.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO TRANSFER CASE TO SAN JOSE DIVISION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 14, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
JEREMY SCHNEIDER on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL, INC., a
Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through
No. C 11-2489
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SPACE
SYSTEMS/LORAL’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
TRANSFER CASE TO SAN JOSE
Before the Court is defendant Space Systems/Loral, Inc.’s Motion for Administrative
Relief to Transfer Case to San Jose Division (“Motion”), filed October 4, 2011. No
opposition has been filed. Having reviewed the Motion, the Court rules as follows.
On September 6, 2011, the Executive Committee of the Northern District of
California exercised its authority under General Order 44 to modify the court’s assignment
plan. See Order of the Executive Committee, In the Matter of Civil Case Assignments to
the San Jose Division During the Pendency of a Judicial Vacancy (Sep. 6, 2011) available
at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/815/OrderoftheEC.pdf. To prevent an
inequitable allocation of civil cases among court divisions, the Executive Committee
ordered that the pending civil cases assigned to District Judge Jeremy Fogel be randomly
reassigned on a district-wide basis to other active and senior district judges. See id.
Pursuant to the special assignment procedure ordered by the Executive Committee, the
above-titled case was properly reassigned to the undersigned.
Accordingly, Space Systems/Loral, Inc.’s Motion is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2011
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?