Schneider v. Space System/Loral, Inc.
Filing
48
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
JEREMY SCHNEIDER, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
No. C 11-2489 MMC
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS
COPY IN COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL
ORDER 45 AND THE COURT’S
STANDING ORDERS
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL, INC., a
Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
16
17
Defendants.
/
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On June 15, 2012, defendant electronically filed its Answer to Plaintiff’s Third
Amended Complaint. Defendant has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing
Orders, however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the
business day following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of
each document that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly
marked with the judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See
General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s
Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of its Answer to Plaintiff’s
Third Amended Complaint.
1
The Court has previously advised defendant of its failure to comply with General
2
Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order in connection with earlier-filed documents. (See
3
Order, filed February 8, 2012.) Such reminder appears to have had little to no effect on
4
compelling compliance therewith.
5
Parties are expected to comply with court rules without repeated reminders.
6
Accordingly, defendant is hereby advised that the Court will impose sanctions, including,
7
but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a
8
chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: June 20, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?