Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting request for extension of time to respond filed by Philips Electronics (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Counsel for Defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation
and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
16

No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

17
Individual Case No.: 11-cv-02495
18
19
20

This Document Relates to Individual
Case No. 11-cv-02495
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
AND SCHEDULING

v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

1

WHEREAS Plaintiff Jaco Electronics, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint (the

2

“Complaint”) in the above-captioned case against Defendants AU Optronics Corporation; AU

3

Optronics Corporation America; Chi Mei Corporation; Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi

4

Mei Optoelectronics Corporation); Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.;

5

Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Epson Imaging Devices Corporation;

6

Epson Electronics America, Inc.; HannStar Display Corporation; LG Display Co. Ltd.; LG

7

Display America, Inc.; Renesas Electronics America; Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.; Samsung SDI

8

America, Inc.; Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.; Sanyo North America Corporation; Sharp

9

Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Tatung Company of America, Inc.; Toshiba

10

Corporation; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display

11

Technology Co., Ltd.; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. (the “Original

12

Defendants”) on May 20, 2011;

13

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on July 12, 2011, naming

14

as additional defendants, among other parties, Philips Electronics North America Corporation

15

and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (the “Stipulating Defendants”);

16

WHEREAS on July 14, 2011, Plaintiff and the Original Defendants stipulated that

17

the Original Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First

18

Amended Complaint would be October 12, 2011;

19
20
21
22

WHEREAS Plaintiff wishes to avoid the burden and expense of serving process
on the Stipulating Defendants;
WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to
respond to the Complaint;

23

WHEREAS Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants believe that proceeding on a

24

unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties by reducing duplicative

25

motion practice;

26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

1

THEREFORE, Plaintiff and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree:

2

1.

The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the First Amended Complaint

3

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the

4

Stipulating Defendants of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited

5

to the defense of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2.

The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or

otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will be October 12, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: August 25, 2011
/s/ Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Philips Electronics North
America Corporation and Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V.
/s/ Jason C. Murray
Jason C. Murray (State Bar No. 169806)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower Street, 40th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
JEFFREY H. HOWARD
JEROME A. MURPHY
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

1
2

Washington, DC 20004
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

3

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jaco Electronics, Inc..

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI

1

I, Brendan P. Cullen, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Service and Scheduling. In compliance with General Order

3

45, X.B., I hereby attest that Jason C. Murray concurred in this filing.

4
5

Dated: August 25, 2011

/s/ Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen

6
7
8

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing,

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
8/25/11

Judge Susan Illston

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
MASTER FILE NO. M 07-1827 SI