Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 58

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARINGS (#56) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011)

Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Filed12/06/11 Page1 of 5

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.
and Jaco Electronics, Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
Case Nos. 11-cv-02495 SI

19

This Document Relates To:

20

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., C 11-02495-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARINGS
ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP

MASTER DOCKET NO.
07-M-1827 SI

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56

1

Filed12/06/11 Page2 of 5

Whereas, defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation (“PENAC”),

2

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (“Royal Philips”), Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.

3

(“Sanyo Consumer Electronics”), Sanyo North America Corporation (“SNA”) and Hannstar

4

Display Corporation1 (“Hannstar”) filed Motions to Dismiss plaintiff Jaco Electronics Inc.’s

5

(“Jaco”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on October 12, 2011;2
Whereas Jaco’s oppositions to the motions to dismiss are currently due on December 14,

6
7

2011;
Whereas the motions to dismiss the Jaco FAC are currently set for hearing on January 13,

8
9

2012;
Whereas the Jaco action is not on the “track 1” schedule, and no pretrial or trial schedule

10
11

has been set for the Jaco action;
Whereas the parties desire to continue the hearing and briefing schedule for the motions to

12
13

dismiss the Jaco FAC, and believe that a continuance will not prejudice the parties or the Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

14
15

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Jaco, on the one hand, and, PENAC,

16

Royal Philips, Sanyo Consumer Electronics, SNA and Hannstar, on the other hand, as follows:
The hearing on the motions to dismiss the Jaco FAC – Docket Nos. 3873, 3876, 3879 and

17
18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22
1

23
24
25
26
27

Hannstar’s Motion was joined by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation
America, Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chimei Optoelectronics
Corp.), Chimei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc.,
Nexgen Mediatech Usa, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America,
Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Sharp Corporation And Sharp Electronics
Corporation, Tatung Company Of America, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., Sanyo
Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sanyo North America Corporation, Samsung SDI America, Inc.,
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.,
Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
2
Docket Nos. 3873, 3876, 3879 and 3880.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56

Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 5

1

3880 – shall be continued to February 24, 2012, and the briefing schedule shall be extended, as

2

follows:

3

a.

Oppositions to be filed by:

January 27, 2012

4

b.

Replies to be filed by:

February 10, 2012

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: December 6, 2011
/s/ Nathanial J. Wood
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

25
26

Counsel for Plaintiff Jaco Electronics, Inc.

27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56

Filed12/06/11 Page4 of 5

1
2

/s/ Brendan P. Cullen

3

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004-2498
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Philips Electronics North
America Corporation and Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

/s/ Allison A. Davis
Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
777 108th Avenue, N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004-5149
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics
Co., Ltd. and Sanyo North America Corporation

26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3-

CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56

Filed12/06/11 Page5 of 5

1
2

/s/ Christopher M. Wyant

3

Hugh F. Bangasser, (Pro Hac Vice)
Ramona M. Emerson, (Pro Hac Vice)
Christopher M. Wyant, (Pro Hac Vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98104-1158
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8

Jeffrey L. Bornstein, State Bar No. 99358
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9
10
11
12

Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display
Corporation

13
14
15

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the

16

filing of this document has been obtained from Brendan P. Cullen, Allison A. Davis and

17

Christopher M. Wyant.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

12/7
Dated: ________________, 2011

21
22
Susan Illston, United States District Judge

23
24

DCACTIVE-16866862.3

25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-4-

CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS