Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 58

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARINGS (#56) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Filed12/06/11 Page1 of 5 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com Counsel for Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc. and Jaco Electronics, Inc. [Additional counsel listed on signature page] 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI Case Nos. 11-cv-02495 SI 19 This Document Relates To: 20 Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al., C 11-02495-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI ATTO RNEY S AT LAW STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56 1 Filed12/06/11 Page2 of 5 Whereas, defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation (“PENAC”), 2 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (“Royal Philips”), Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. 3 (“Sanyo Consumer Electronics”), Sanyo North America Corporation (“SNA”) and Hannstar 4 Display Corporation1 (“Hannstar”) filed Motions to Dismiss plaintiff Jaco Electronics Inc.’s 5 (“Jaco”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on October 12, 2011;2 Whereas Jaco’s oppositions to the motions to dismiss are currently due on December 14, 6 7 2011; Whereas the motions to dismiss the Jaco FAC are currently set for hearing on January 13, 8 9 2012; Whereas the Jaco action is not on the “track 1” schedule, and no pretrial or trial schedule 10 11 has been set for the Jaco action; Whereas the parties desire to continue the hearing and briefing schedule for the motions to 12 13 dismiss the Jaco FAC, and believe that a continuance will not prejudice the parties or the Court; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 14 15 undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Jaco, on the one hand, and, PENAC, 16 Royal Philips, Sanyo Consumer Electronics, SNA and Hannstar, on the other hand, as follows: The hearing on the motions to dismiss the Jaco FAC – Docket Nos. 3873, 3876, 3879 and 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 1 23 24 25 26 27 Hannstar’s Motion was joined by AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chimei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chimei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech Usa, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Sharp Corporation And Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company Of America, Inc., Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sanyo North America Corporation, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 2 Docket Nos. 3873, 3876, 3879 and 3880. 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -1- MASTER DOCKET NO. 07-M-1827 SI STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56 Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 5 1 3880 – shall be continued to February 24, 2012, and the briefing schedule shall be extended, as 2 follows: 3 a. Oppositions to be filed by: January 27, 2012 4 b. Replies to be filed by: February 10, 2012 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: December 6, 2011 /s/ Nathanial J. Wood Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214) Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: 213-622-4750 Facsimile: 213-622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com jstokes@crowell.com nwood@crowell.com Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) CROWELL & MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: 202-624-2500 Facsimile: 202-628-5116 Email: jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice) R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice) Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice) ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP 1875 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: 202-580-8822 Facsimile: 202-580-8821 Email: adams@adamsholcomb.com holcomb@adamsholcomb.com leonardo@adamsholcomb.com 25 26 Counsel for Plaintiff Jaco Electronics, Inc. 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -2- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56 Filed12/06/11 Page4 of 5 1 2 /s/ Brendan P. Cullen 3 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 cullenb@sullcrom.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Garrard R. Beeney (NY Reg. No. 1656172) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 beeneyg@sullcrom.com Counsel for Defendants Philips Electronics North America Corporation and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 /s/ Allison A. Davis Allison A. Davis (SBN 139203) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-4880 allisondavis@dwt.com Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 777 108th Avenue, N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004-5149 Telephone: (425) 646-6125 Facsimile: (425) 646-6199 nickverwolf@dwt.com Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. and Sanyo North America Corporation 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -3- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Case3:11-cv-02495-SI Document56 Filed12/06/11 Page5 of 5 1 2 /s/ Christopher M. Wyant 3 Hugh F. Bangasser, (Pro Hac Vice) Ramona M. Emerson, (Pro Hac Vice) Christopher M. Wyant, (Pro Hac Vice) K&L GATES LLP 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900 Seattle, WA 98104-1158 Phone: (206) 623-7580 Fax: (206) 623-7022 4 5 6 7 8 Jeffrey L. Bornstein, State Bar No. 99358 K&L GATES LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: (415) 249-1059 Fax: (415) 882-8220 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation 13 14 15 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the 16 filing of this document has been obtained from Brendan P. Cullen, Allison A. Davis and 17 Christopher M. Wyant. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 12/7 Dated: ________________, 2011 21 22 Susan Illston, United States District Judge 23 24 DCACTIVE-16866862.3 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -4- CASE NO. C 09-5840 SI STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?