Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
82
ORDER DENYING NEC'S MOTION TO STAY TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL (JACO ELECTRONICS)(Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
/
No. M 07-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827
10
This Order Relates To:
No. C 11-2495 SI
11
JACO ELECTRONICS, INC.,
ORDER DENYING NEC’S MOTION TO
STAY TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
PENDING APPEAL
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Defendants NEC Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., and Renesas Electronics America,
18
Inc. (collectively, “NEC”) have filed a motion to stay the proceedings against them pending their appeal
19
of this Court’s order granting in part their motion to compel arbitration. Given the complexity of this
20
MDL, the Court has generally been disinclined to grant stays to individual defendants. NEC has not
21
persuaded the Court to depart from this general rule. Whatever NEC’s likelihood of success on appeal,
22
the Court is convinced that permitting partial stays to specific defendants represents an unmanageable
23
option. Further, the Court is cognizant of the fact that NEC is a defendant in numerous other cases
24
in this MDL. Thus, a stay would do little to defer the cost of this litigation to NEC. See Motion at 11-
25
12 (claiming that NEC will suffer irreparable injury primarily because of cost of litigation and noting
26
that NEC has “not engaged in any discovery to date”).
27
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, the Court hereby DENIES
28
NEC’s motion to stay trial court proceedings pending appeal. The hearing currently scheduled for
1
March 2, 2012 is VACATED. See Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Docket No. 4652 in 07-1827; Docket
2
No. 63 in 11-2495.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: February 29, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?