Hariharan v. Adobe Systems Inc. et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION /Extending Time To Respond To Complaint by Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Siddharth Hariharan, Intel Corp., Intuit Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd., Pixar. (Tubach, Michael) (Filed on 5/26/2011) (Entered: 05/26/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

GEORGE RILEY (S.B. #118304)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL TUBACH (S.B. #145955)
[e-mail]
FLORA VIGO (S.B. #239643)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.

9

[Additional Parties and Counsel Listed on Signature Page.]

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15

SIDDHARTH HARIHARAN,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

Case No. CV 11 2509 (JCS)
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., APPLE
INC., GOOGLE INC., INTEL CORP.,
INTUIT INC., LUCASFILM LTD.,
PIXAR, AND DOES 1-200,
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV 11 2509 (JCS)

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties to this action stipulate that all

2

Defendants shall have until the earlier of July 25, 2011, or the date by which any

3

Defendant responds to any other complaint that raises similar claims for relief, to respond

4

to the complaint filed by Plaintiff Siddharth Hariharan. This stipulation will not alter the

5

date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order in this case.

6

Dated: May 26, 2011

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Joseph R. Saveri
JOSEPH R. SAVERI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SIDDHARTH HARIHARAN

9
10
11

Dated: May 26, 2011

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

12
By: /s/ Michael F. Tubach
MICHAEL F. TUBACH
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

13
14
15
16

Dated: May 26, 2011

17

By: /s/ Daniel Purcell
DANIEL PURCELL
Attorneys for Defendant
LUCASFILM LTD.

18
19
20

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

Dated: May 26, 2011

JONES DAY

21
22
23

By: /s/ David C. Kiernan
DAVID C. KIERNAN
Attorneys for Defendant
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.

24
25
26
27
28
-1-

STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV 11 2509 (JCS)

1

Dated: May 26, 2011

MAYER BROWN LLP

2
By: /s/ Lee H. Rubin
LEE H. RUBIN
EDWARD D. JOHNSON
DONALD M. FALK
Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE INC.

3
4
5
6
Dated: May 26, 2011

BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Holly A. House
HOLLY A. HOUSE
Attorneys for Defendant
INTEL CORPORATION

9
10
11

Dated: May 26, 2011

JONES DAY

12
By: /s/ Robert A. Mittelstaedt
ROBERT A. MITTELSTAEDT
CRAIG E. STEWART
CATHERINE T. BRODERICK
Attorneys for Defendant
INTUIT INC.

13
14
15
16
Dated: May 26, 2011

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

17
18
19

By: /s/ Emily Johnson Henn
EMILY JOHNSON HENN
Attorneys for Defendant
PIXAR

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV 11 2509 (JCS)

1

Filer’s Attestation

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that

3

concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all the signatories.

4
5
6

Dated: May 26, 2011

/s/ Michael F. Tubach
Michael F. Tubach
O’Melveny & Myers LLP

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION EXTENDING
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. CV 11 2509 (JCS)