MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
676
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER, GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 2/19/20 13 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Trial set for 2/19/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/2/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2011)
1
2
*E-Filed 9/2/11*
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
No. C 11-02525 RS
MEDIOSTREAM INC,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING
ORDER AND ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE
ORDER, GRANTING MOTION TO
WITHDRAW
v.
15
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
/
17
18
Pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, the parties attended a Case
19
Management Conference on September 1, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management
20
Statement submitted by the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
21
THAT:
22
1.
23
Conference shall be held on September 6, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor,
24
United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties
25
shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.
26
2.
27
Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than November 29, 2013.
28
3.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil
TRIAL DATE. Jury trial shall commence on February 19, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
1
California.
2
4.
3
activity prior to July 1, 2012. All discovery motions that may have been pending prior to the
4
transfer of this action to this district are hereby denied without prejudice. If it becomes
5
necessary to obtain court relief regarding any of the matters raised in such motions, they must
6
be renoticed after July 1, 2012, and will be referred to a magistrate judge for resolution. The
7
motion of Goodwin Procter, LLP to be relieved as counsel for plaintiff is granted.
8
5.
9
however, it shall not be required to produce the source code in dispute at any geographical
Except as provided herein, the parties shall not engage in discovery or other litigation
Apple, Inc.’s motion to modify the protective order is denied without prejudice,
location outside this district. The parties are directed to meet and confer to reach agreement as
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
to where the computers on which the source code has previously been made available will be
12
moved or maintained. In the event the language of the protective order requires modification
13
once such an agreement is reached, the parties may submit an appropriate stipulation.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: 9/1/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?