MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 695

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION RE PLACEMENT OF APPLE SOURCE CODE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 3/12/12* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 MEDIOSTREAM, INC., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al., Case No. C 11-2525 RS ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION RE PLACEMENT OF APPLE SOURCE CODE Defendants. ____________________________________/ 18 19 The parties’ briefing regarding their dispute as to where the Apple source code should be 20 maintained reveals that there is still a possibility they can reach a mutually-agreeable resolution. 21 Accordingly, the hearing set for March 22, 2012 is vacated. The parties shall engage in further meet 22 and confer negotiations, focusing on reaching a solution that serves the legitimate needs and 23 concerns of both sides, putting aside any extraneous issues or rancor that may have arisen between 24 them in the past. If the parties are unable to resolve the issue by April 13, 2012, they shall file a 25 joint letter brief, not to exceed 5 pages, advising the Court of that fact. The letter brief may include 26 any new information or developments that either side may wish the Court to consider, but shall not 27 re-argue or merely attempt to rebut any assertions made in the existing briefing. The matter will then 28 1 be taken under submission without oral argument. If the parties resolve the issue, they may file an 2 appropriate stipulation at any time prior to April 13, 2012. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 3/12/12 7 8 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?