MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
695
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON MOTION RE PLACEMENT OF APPLE SOURCE CODE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
*E-Filed 3/12/12*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
13
14
15
16
17
MEDIOSTREAM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.,
Case No. C 11-2525 RS
ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
MOTION RE PLACEMENT OF
APPLE SOURCE CODE
Defendants.
____________________________________/
18
19
The parties’ briefing regarding their dispute as to where the Apple source code should be
20
maintained reveals that there is still a possibility they can reach a mutually-agreeable resolution.
21
Accordingly, the hearing set for March 22, 2012 is vacated. The parties shall engage in further meet
22
and confer negotiations, focusing on reaching a solution that serves the legitimate needs and
23
concerns of both sides, putting aside any extraneous issues or rancor that may have arisen between
24
them in the past. If the parties are unable to resolve the issue by April 13, 2012, they shall file a
25
joint letter brief, not to exceed 5 pages, advising the Court of that fact. The letter brief may include
26
any new information or developments that either side may wish the Court to consider, but shall not
27
re-argue or merely attempt to rebut any assertions made in the existing briefing. The matter will then
28
1
be taken under submission without oral argument. If the parties resolve the issue, they may file an
2
appropriate stipulation at any time prior to April 13, 2012.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: 3/12/12
7
8
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?