MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 697

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/2/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Byron Cooper (State Bar No. 166578)
530 Lytton Avenue, Suite 200
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Stephen D. Susman (pro hac vice)
Max L. Tribble Jr. (pro hac vice)
Joseph S. Grinstein (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14

S. Calvin Capshaw (pro hac vice)
Elizabeth L. DeRieux (pro hac vice)
CAPSHAW DeRIEUX, LLP
114 E. Commerce Ave.
Gladewater, TX 75647
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEDIOSTREAM, INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

MEDIOSTREAM, INC.,

20
21

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 3:11‐CV‐02525 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE

22
23
24

MICROSOFT CORP. et. al.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SOURCE CODE

Case No. 3:11‐CV‐02525 RS

1

Plaintiff MedioStream, Inc. and Defendant Apple Inc. hereby stipulate and agree:

2

Whereas MedioStream and Apple had a dispute about the location of source code to be made

3
4

available in this case;
Whereas Apple filed a Motion for Court Order Regarding Placement of Apple Source Code

5

(ECF No. 682); MedioStream opposed this Motion (ECF No. 686); and Apple filed a reply in support

6

thereof (ECF No. 694);

7
8
9
10
11

Whereas the Court ordered MedioStream and Apple to meet and confer further in an effort to
resolve the dispute (ECF No. 695); and
Whereas MedioStream and Apple did meet and confer and have reached an agreement as to
the location of software to be made available in this case;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the

12

undersigned counsel for MedioStream and Apple, subject to the approval of this Honorable Court, that

13

Apple’s motion has been mooted by the parties’ agreement and that Paragraph 5 of the Court’s Case

14

Management Scheduling Order and Order Denying Motion to Modify Protective Order, Granting

15

Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 676) should be vacated. MedioStream and Apple hereby respectfully

16

request that the Court enter the attached proposed order.

17
18

Dated: March 30, 2012

19

Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/Byron Cooper
Byron Cooper (State Bar No. 166578)
530 Lytton Avenue, Suite 200
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

20
21
22
23

Stephen D. Susman (pro hac vice)
Max L. Tribble Jr. (pro hac vice)
Joseph S. Grinstein (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SOURCE CODE

-2-

Case No. 3:11‐CV‐02525 RS

1

Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

2
3

Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Ste. 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

4
5
6
7

S. Calvin Capshaw (pro hac vice)
Elizabeth L. DeRieux (pro hac vice)
D. Jeffrey Rambin (pro hac vice)
CAPSHAW DeRIEUX, LLP
114 E. Commerce Ave.
Gladewater, TX 75647
Tel: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEDIOSTREAM, INC.

15

/s/ Mark C. Scarsi (with permission)
Mark C. Scarsi (Bar No. 183926)
Chris L. Holm (Bar No. 249388)
Hannah Cannom (Bar No. 245635)
Caitlin K. Hawks (Bar No. 260417)
MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY &
MCCLOY LLP
601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SOURCE CODE

-3-

Case No. 3:11‐CV‐02525 RS

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
After considering the Stipulation filed by MedioStream, Inc. and Apple Inc. and good cause

3

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that upon the representation of MedioStream and Apple that

4

they have resolved the underlying dispute, the Court hereby vacates Apple’s Motion for Court Order

5

Regarding Placement of Apple Source Code (ECF No. 682) and Paragraph 5 of the Court’s Case

6

Management Scheduling Order and Order Denying Motion to Modify Protective Order, Granting

7

Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 676).

8

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

9
10

4/2/12
Date:_____________________

__________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING SOURCE CODE

-4-

Case No. 3:11‐CV‐02525 RS