MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 862

ORDER RE SCHEDULING. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/28/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

8

12
13
14

MEDIOSTREAM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

15

ORDER RE SCHEDULING

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, et al.,

16

Case No. C 11-2525 RS

Defendants.
____________________________________/

17
18

Defendants’ motion for a stay will be heard as previously scheduled on February 7, 2013 at

19

1:30 p.m., in conjunction with a Case Management Conference. The hearing dates for all other

20

motions presently set to be heard by the undersigned (as opposed to discovery motions referred to

21

the magistrate judge) are vacated.

22

Defendants have filed a series of topic-specific summary judgment motions. Absent prior

23

approval, such multiple motions are generally improper and violate page limit rules. Even where

24

good cause exists to permit multiple topic-specific motions, a series of hearing dates in a short span

25

of time would rarely be allowed. Accordingly, the parties should be prepared to address at the Case

26

Management Conference a schedule for hearing all remaining substantive or procedural motions

27

currently on file or anticipated to be filed, including the various summary judgment and severance

28

motions, in the event the motion to stay is denied.

1
2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2013

5
6
7

RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2