Boy Racer, Inc v. Does

Filing 9

ORDER re 8 Stipulation filed by Boy Racer, Inc. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/8/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
Steele Hansmeier PLLC.
38 Miller Avenue, #263
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-325-5900
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

BOY RACER, INC.,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DOES 1-73,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
____________________________________)

No. CV-11-02534 MEJ
STIPULATION; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

17
18
19
20
21

STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
In the wake of the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Expedited

22

Discovery [DKT# 7] (hereinafter “the Order”), Plaintiff Boy Racer, Inc. and a third-party Internet

23

Service Provider, Comcast Corporation (hereinafter “Comcast”), made the following negotiated

24

stipulation with regards to subscriber response timelines:

25
26
27
28

All subscribers linked directly to Internet Protocol Addresses (hereinafter “IP
Addresses”) referenced on Exhibit A of the Complaint (DKT#1 at 13) that have been
issued by the Internet Service Provider Comcast shall be given 30 days to file any
motions related to or challenging the subpoenas, including, but not limited to,
motions to quash.

1
2
3
4
5
6

This stipulation only applies to subscribers of Comcast. All other IP Addresses issued by other
Internet Service Providers listed on Exhibit A of the Complaint (DKT#1 at 13) shall only receive the
time frame allotted in the Order (i.e. 15 days). Plaintiff requests that the Court acknowledge this
stipulation by signing the (proposed) order below.

7
Respectfully Submitted,

8
9
10

DATED: June 7, 2011

11

By:

____/s/ Brett L. Gibbs, Esq._______

12

Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
Steele Hansmeier PLLC.
38 Miller Avenue, #263
Mill Valley, CA 94941
[e-mail]

13
14
15

Attorney for Plaintiff

16
17
18
19
20
21

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 8, 2011
Dated: _____________________

_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER

No. CV-11-02534 MEJ