Boy Racer Inc. v. Does 1-98

Filing 6

Proposed Order re 5 Ex Parte Application For, and Memorandum of Law in Support of, Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference Ex Parte Application For, and Memorandum of Law in Support of, Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference by Boy Racer Inc.. (Gibbs, Brett) (Filed on 5/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000) Steele Hansmeier PLLC. 38 Miller Avenue, #263 Mill Valley, CA 94941 415-325-5900 blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 BOY RACER, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) DOES 1-98, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________) No. C-11-02536 JCS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Discovery Prior 20 to Rule 26(f) Conference [DKT#5]. Good cause and joinder appearing therefore and for the reasons 21 cited in Plaintiff’s Application, said application is GRANTED. Plaintiff is hereby authorized to 22 serve Rule 45 subpoenas and a copy of this Order upon each and every Internet Service Provider 23 (ISPs) identified in Exhibit A attached to the Complaint [DKT#1]. The information sought shall be 24 25 26 27 28 limited to information sufficient to identify each Defendant based on supplied IP addresses, including name, currect (and permanent) address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control address. 1 Each ISP so served shall, in turn, serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this Order upon 2 the subscriber (whose identity is sought through the subpoena and for whom Plaintiff has provided 3 4 5 6 an IP address) within thirty (30) days of the ISP’s receipt of the subpoena. The subscribers, and the ISPs, shall then have thirty (30) days from the date of service upon them to file any objections, or Motions to Quash, with this Court. If that 30-day period elapses without any subscriber filing an 7 objection or motion to quash, the ISP served with the subpoena shall have ten (10) days after said 8 lapse to produce each subscriber’s name, address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media 9 Accress Control addresses to Plaintiff pursuant to the subpoena. 10 11 The Court further orders that any information disclosed to Plaintiff in response to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for the purpose of prosecuting this litigation. Plaintiff and 12 13 any entity which receives a subpoena shall confer, if necessary, with respect to the issue of payment 14 for the information requested in the subpoena. If any entity subpoenaed pursuant to this Order 15 wishes to move to quash the subpoena, it must do so before the return date of the subpoena, which 16 shall be sixty (60) days from the date of service. It is ordered that the subpoenaed entity shall 17 preserve any suppoenaed information pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash. 18 This order disposes of Docket No. 5. 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:______________________ _________________________________ Joseph C. Spero United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY No. C-11-02536 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?