Smith v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 12

ORDER granting second request to file a response. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2011)

7
8

P. RANDALL NOAH (SBN 136452)
21 Orinda Way, Suite C, #316
Orinda, CA 94563
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

I

on

san Illst

u
Judge S

RT

10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TAMMY SMITH

ER

H

11

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

NO

9

UNIT
ED

6

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

Attorneys for Defendant
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

R NIA

5

FO

4

LI

3

A

2

TAD A. DEVLIN (SBN 190355)
GORDON & REES, LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco CA, 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

S

1

N

12

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
TAMMY SMITH,

CASE NO. C11-02559-SI

16

SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE
PLEADING PURSUANT TO FRCP
6(b)(1) AND CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1

Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
19

The Honorable Susan Illston
Defendant.

20
21
22

STIPULATION
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 6-1, Defendant Aetna Life

23

Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and Plaintiff Tammy Smith (“Smith”) hereby stipulate to

24

extend the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to July 29, 2011, without

25

waiving any defenses available by statute or court rule.

26

On May 26, 2011, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Aetna in this court. Aetna was

27

purportedly served with the Summons and Complaint on June 2, 2011. Based on the alleged

28

-1-

___________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. C11-02559-SI

1
2

receipt date, the deadline for responding to the Complaint was June 23, 2011.
On June 22, 2011, counsel for Defendant and Plaintiff agreed to extend the time for

3

filing a responsive pleading to July 8, 2011. On June 23, 2011, the parties filed a Stipulation

4

to Extend Time to File a Responsive Pleading (Dkt. No. 9).

5

On June 30, 2011, the parties conferred, and Plaintiff agreed to further extend the time

6

for Defendant to file a responsive pleading to July 29, 2011, so Defendant can properly

7

investigate the claims. Accordingly, Defendant has good cause to seek an extension to file its

8

responsive pleading, and the parties stipulate that the time for Defendant to file a responsive

9

pleading is extended to July 29, 2011.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED

11
12

Dated: July 6, 2011

GORDON & REES LLP

13
By: /s/ Tad A. Devlin
Tad Devlin, SBN 190355
Attorneys For Defendant
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated: July 6, 2011

LAW OFFICES OF P. RANDALL NOAH

20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ P. Randall Noah
P. Randall Noah, SBN 136452
Attorneys For Plaintiff
21 Orinda Way, Suite C, #316
Orinda, CA 94563
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

26
27
28

-2-

___________________________________________________________________________
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING
CASE NO. C11-02559-SI