McDowell et al v. State of California et al

Filing 9

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer striking 8 Motion for Hearing. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

No. C 11-02569 CRB

FRANK AND DEBORAH MCDOWELL,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
REQUEST DATE FOR HEARING

Plaintiff,
v.
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.

/

16
17

Pro se plaintiffs Frank and Deborah McDowell have filed a document entitled

18

“Motion to Request Date for Hearing,” see dkt. 8, which appears to be (but for the title) the

19

exact same document, verbatim, as their application for a Temporary Restraining Order,

20

see dkt. 2. The Court has already denied Plaintiffs’ application for a Temporary Restraining

21

Order. See dkt. 4. Accordingly, this further Motion (dkt. 8) is STRICKEN as duplicative

22

and moot. The Court will not hold a hearing on an application that has already been denied.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: June 23, 2011

26
27
28

G:\CRBALL\2011\2569\TRO.wpd

CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE