Garvey v. Kmart Corporation
Filing
413
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE RE FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND PROPOSED FORM OF NOTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 30, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. C 11-02575 WHA
COLLETTE DELBRIDGE, individually
and on behalf of others similarly situated,
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE
RE FINAL SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT AND PROPOSED
FORM OF NOTICE
v.
KMART CORPORATION,
Defendant.
/
17
18
19
As stated at today’s hearing, the parties shall file their final settlement agreement and
20
proposed forms of notice to the Tulare and Redlands class members by AUGUST 9 AT NOON.
21
The Court has not given preliminary approval to the request for incentive payments to class
22
representatives. Counsel shall make sure that the mailing addresses for class members are
23
accurate so that we will avoid the problem of having to decide whether class members who fail
24
to receive actual notice are bound by the release.
25
Plaintiff Garvey’s Rule 60 motion will be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the outcome of
26
the final settlement motion. The July 31 hearing date is VACATED. For now, trial and pretrial
27
28
1
deadlines shall remain in place. The parties may move to stay such deadlines as part of their
2
submission on August 9.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: July 30, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?