Garvey v. Kmart Corporation

Filing 413

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE RE FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND PROPOSED FORM OF NOTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 30, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. C 11-02575 WHA COLLETTE DELBRIDGE, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE RE FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND PROPOSED FORM OF NOTICE v. KMART CORPORATION, Defendant. / 17 18 19 As stated at today’s hearing, the parties shall file their final settlement agreement and 20 proposed forms of notice to the Tulare and Redlands class members by AUGUST 9 AT NOON. 21 The Court has not given preliminary approval to the request for incentive payments to class 22 representatives. Counsel shall make sure that the mailing addresses for class members are 23 accurate so that we will avoid the problem of having to decide whether class members who fail 24 to receive actual notice are bound by the release. 25 Plaintiff Garvey’s Rule 60 motion will be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending the outcome of 26 the final settlement motion. The July 31 hearing date is VACATED. For now, trial and pretrial 27 28 1 deadlines shall remain in place. The parties may move to stay such deadlines as part of their 2 submission on August 9. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: July 30, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?