T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 120

Joinder in re Small Screen Direct Action Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion Re Trial Structure and for Relief to Avoid Duplicative Recovery filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Taylor, Brooke) (Filed on 4/4/2012) Modified on 4/5/2012 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

This Document Relates to
Case C 3:11-02591 SI
T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,
Plaintiff,

19
20

v.

21

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

JOINDER OF PLAINTIFF
T-MOBILE USA, INC. IN SMALL
SCREEN DIRECT ACTION
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
REGARDING TRIAL STRUCTURE
AND FOR RELIEF TO AVOID
DUPLICATE RECOVERY

22

Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827 

JOINDER OF PLAINTIFF T-MOBILE USA, INC. IN SMALL
SCREEN DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION REGARDING TRIAL STRUCTURE
AND FOR RELIEF TO AVOID DUPLICATE RECOVERY

1

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff T-Mobile USA, Inc. joins in the arguments

2

made with respect to small screen LCD products made in the Small Screen Direct Action

3

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion Regarding Trial Structure and for Relief to Avoid

4

Duplicative Recovery, Dkt. No. 5405.

5

Dated: April 4, 2012

6

By:
/s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10
11

Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

26

-2-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827 
2230730V1/011730

JOINDER OF PLAINTIFF T-MOBILE USA, INC. IN SMALL
SCREEN DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION REGARDING TRIAL STRUCTURE
AND FOR RELIEF TO AVOID DUPLICATE RECOVERY