T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 129

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 119 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim,, 118 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim,, filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Rubinstein, Jason) (Filed on 6/19/2012)

1
2
3
4

David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
Jason C. Rubinstein (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
12

[Additional counsel listed on signature pages]
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU
Optronics Corporation, et al., Case No.
3:11-cv-03763 SI

20
21
22
23
24
25

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
ANSWER OR RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT LG DISPLAY’S
COUNTERCLAIMS

Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-02495 SI,
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-02225 SI
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation,
et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-04119 SI

26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No 3:11-cv-02591 SI
Defendants LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. (together, “LG Display”) and
the Direct Action Plaintiffs (“DAPs”) in the above captioned actions stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, LG Display amended its answers as of right to assert Counterclaims for Declaratory
Relief (the “LG Display Counterclaims”) in Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-03763 SI, Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:11-cv-02225 SI, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-04119 SI, T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation, et
al., Case No 3:11-cv-02591 SI, on March 21, 2012, and in Jaco Electronics, Inc. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-02495 SI, on March 23, 2012;
WHEREAS the DAPs that were served with the LG Display Counterclaims are currently
required to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to those counterclaims by June 22, 2012;
WHEREAS if the DAPs move to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims, LG Display is
currently required to file its Opposition to such motion by July 20, 2012;
WHEREAS if the DAPs move to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims, the DAPs are currently
required to file their Replies in support of such motion by August 3, 2012;
WHEREAS the parties desire a reasonable amount of time to answer, move against, or otherwise
respond to the LG Display Counterclaims; and
WHEREAS the parties wish to coordinate their responses to the LG Display Counterclaims to
allow for a more efficient use of the Court and the parties’ time;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
undersigned DAPs and LG Display, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, as follows:
(1)

The time for the undersigned DAPs to answer, move against, or otherwise

respond to the LG Display Counterclaims shall be extended to July 19, 2012.

26
27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

(2)

If the DAPs move against the LG Display Counterclaims, they shall file a

2

combined motion to dismiss. Subject to this requirement, each and every DAP reserves the right to file

3

separate motions to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims to address any questions of law or fact not

4

common to all DAPs.

5
6
7

(3)

If the DAPs move to dismiss the LG Display Counterclaims, LG Display shall file

its Opposition to such motion by August 16, 2012.
(4)

The DAPs shall file their Replies (if any) by August 30, 2012.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-2-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1
2

SO STIPULATED:
Dated: June __, 2012
By:

3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Jason C. Rubinstein
David Orozco
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Parker C. Folse III
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13

Edward A. Friedman
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jason C. Rubinstein
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

23
24
25
26

-3-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6

/s/ William A. Isaacson
William A. Isaacson
E-Mail: [e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Philip J. Iovieno
E-Mail: [e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Counsel for Plaintiffs Office Depot, Inc., Interbond
Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son Long
Island Corporation, MARTA Cooperative of America,
Inc., and ABC Appliance, Inc.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-4-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By:

2
3
4
5
6
7

/s/ Nathaniel J. Wood
Jason C. Murray
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Joshua C. Stokes
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Nathaniel J. Wood
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Jeffrey H. Howard
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jerome A. Murphy
E-Mail: [e-mail]
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14

Counsel for Plaintiffs Jaco Electronics, Inc.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-5-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS

1

By: /s/ Lee F. Berger
Holly House (State Bar No. 136045)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Kevin C. McCann (Sate Bar No. 120874)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6
7

Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10
11
12

Attorneys for LG Display Co., Ltd., and LG Display
America, Inc

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated: _________________, 2012

23

______________________________________
The Honorable Susan Y. Illston
United States District Judge

24
25
26

-6-

27
28

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
MDL NO. 1827

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
OR RESPOND TO DEFENDANT
LG DISPLAY’S COUNTERCLAIMS